But as everyone knows, there were WMD's, Saddam used them even after the first gulf war, in 1991, on his own people. Nobody can say otherwise. The question that we are left with is, what happened to them? That is the real issue in going to war in Iraq.....what happened to them, and who knows what happened to them. And contrary to popular belief, there have been WMD's found, but surprise, surprise, the media overlooks it.
2007-12-10 13:22:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kirk 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
we are nearing the day as quickly as we can hit Iran . maximum individuals understand that or a minimum of begrudgingly nicely known that . yet what anybody is lacking is that we will additionally in all probability hit Syria , probable concurrently with Iran . Why ? nicely , different than for the glaring Syrian terrorist help , there is often been that nagging concern of that convoy of automobiles that left Iraq days until now the conflict . that comparable convoy that we tracked into the middle of the Bekka Valley . Out interior the path of nowhere and then by surprise surrounded and guarded by potential of Syria's #a million Brigade the place they stayed placed for months . No why might any u . s . a . arbitrarily set up their #a million Brigade to the middle of nowhere for no obvious reason ? -- WMD's possibly ? nicely , sure , except any of you have a miles better clarification .
2016-10-11 00:45:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by estiven 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually all the intelligence agencies throughout the world had come to the same conclusion that there were WMDs prior to the United States going into Iraq.
Obviously Saddam had used some on his own people when he ordered the killing of thousands of his own people in the Kurdish territory.
2007-12-10 13:22:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bubba 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
many intelligence officials believed Iraq had zero WMDs. Tyler Drummerhiller was one of them. The Bush white house ignored them b/c the paul wolfowitz chickenhawks were horny about invading iraq many years ago. They thought the Iraq war would be like taking candy from a baby. Bush has the slows when it comes to leadership.
2007-12-10 13:21:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by AB17 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Is this a hypothetical? Are you kidding? There were WMD's because he used them and the world acknowledged it, and the Kurds suffered because of it. The hatred toward George Bush just goes beyond the pale.
2007-12-10 13:51:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by robbie 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think Iraq had a little left over poison gas from the 1990,s or so,,,that's not WMDS,s,,,and I also think CIA gave them the gas...to hit Iran with,,,chow f.p
2007-12-10 13:31:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
How could Bush, "knew that there weren't any", when EVERY intelligence agency in the USA, Britain, France, Germany told him there were and they'd used them on their own people?
2007-12-10 13:20:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
He did have them. It does not have to be nuclear to be considered a WMD.
2007-12-10 13:48:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Robert S 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Then France would rule the world. Would you want that?!?!
2007-12-10 13:28:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Horcasitas 3
·
0⤊
1⤋