Do you agree or disagree that globalization contributes to sustainable prosperity of all ppl? and why?

Question

i have to write an essay on this topic and i just need some peoples opinions to help me get tarted... k thx

Answer 1

I agree. Globalization is really a term used to demonize the concept of liberty and free trade between all people. If I am free to trade with whomever I choose, I will not do so with anyone unless I benefit. The same is true for all people.

Answer 2

Not all people, the species as a whole. We would need a eutopia form of government for it to include all people, which we currently have no form of government that can give that.

The lines of morality tend to blur when it comes to absolute power, which is why a eutopia is necessary. Globalization will always fail without it. I know how to setup a eutopia form of government to stabilize globalization, but a country would have to adopt it first before globalization happens. As the country grows it would naturally consume the rest of the world through immigration and science, which will globalize everything.

Current steps being taking towards globalization are the creation of unions. Three countries unionized into one, which its division by divide and conquer. Eventually it will reach singularity, but I do not think unionization by itself will succeed and instead eventually result in a complete collapse in everything humanity has worked for, which we will then be back at square one again.

Answer 3

Sustainable? Absolutley not.

Capitalism is about capitalizing resources. Liberal capitalist model is the epitome of globalization.. the free movement of goods and ideas across the earth.

Globalization is not sustainable by nature. It depends on cheap hydrocarbon fuels to transport goods across the world in order to elminiate geographic obstacles for access, and to greater enhance the comparative advantages of nations. For example, the US gets a great deal of its manufactured goods from China. this was not the case 150 years ago (of coruse, beyond china's infrastructure back then), because transport was slower and not dependent on hydro carbons.

when oil begins to run dry, transport will inevitably decrease. The world will become larger.

I'd recommed looking at some books on the following:
1. Liberal/Capitalist economic models.
2. Transportation changes in the 20th Century.
3. James Kunstler's "The Long Emergency".

Look up pro-globalization journal articles (you can usually find online and make sure they are a credible source... Geographer Journals are always good as well as Economics ones. compare anti-globalization articles with pro-globalization articles. Break it down and do a critical analysis, it is your paper and make sure you put your own intellect in it through the critical analysis.

Answer 4

no it contributes to a more uneven ditribution of wealth. The more that globalization or free trade takes over the more people with advantages can exploit others. Through this process rich become richer and poor become poorer. Just look at sub-saharan Africa the poorest region on earth. 11% of the world pop. produces only 1% of the worlds GDP. THe more we lower trade regulations and allow for more free trade the more the rich countries will use their advantage to exploit the poor. Globalization is only making the powerful more powerful. So I guess its a good thing for the U.S.

Answer 5

I agree in area because of the fact the economic factor of globalization has made it plausible for the government to make equalization income the process Canada to remedy disparity subject concerns. Sustainability and prosperity may be completed by way of "residing interior the Earth's limits" and protecting the ecosystem for destiny generations. devoid of those materials, it does no longer have been plausible to create a sparkling worldwide economic equipment or unfold the loose industry economic equipment's impact. it incredibly is seemingly an somewhat arguable subject remember and human beings proportion many diverse perspectives in this subject remember. anybody such because of the fact the persons in bobbing up countries have not yet experienced the full reward of economic globalization. yet whilst we proceed to apply materials interior the form we are presently utilising them, it is going to bring about the downfall of civilization itself.

Answer 6

all of these answers are a bunch of balony and cheese do not listen to them these are just opiniions from randum people that dont kno0w a thing about this. niot saying that i do. :)

Answer 7

it really is about corporate profits and corporations being like nations...they don't have to play by the rules of the US...there are few international rules....exchanging one master for another