By rearranging the cosine rule equation above you can get,
b^2 - 2bc(cos A) + (c^2 - a^2) = 0
If we chuck everything into the quadratic formula (where b is like the x you'd normally solve for).
b = [(2c(cos A)) +/- sqrt((2c(cos A))^2 - 4(c^2 - a^2))] / 2
Here +/- is 'plus or minus'.
I figure it'll be bloody hard to read, so you'll have to understand what I've done to copy it down correctly anyway.
2007-12-10 11:36:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by betamaxreturns 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
hey.
This is the the cosine rule.
i.e you use it to solve triangles
if u have 2 sides and an angle.
this can work for any three angles
a b or c
so if u had a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc(cos(a))
this can be written in a different way which equates b given that u have angle b .
the formula would be
b^2 = a^2+c^2 - 2ac cos(b)
so b will be square root of wats on the others side.
Hope this helps.
2007-12-10 11:29:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by sudhi_kandi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
a million+a million=2 besides, somebody with some distance too plenty time on their hands desperate to tutor it... "The evidence starts off from the Peano Postulates, which define the organic numbers N. N is the smallest set relaxing those postulates: P1. a million is in N. P2. If x is in N, then its "successor" x' is in N. P3. there's no x such that x' = a million. P4. If x isn't a million, then there's a y in N such that y' = x. P5. If S is a subset of N, a million is in S, and the implication (x in S => x' in S) holds, then S = N. then you certainly ought to stipulate addition recursively: Def: permit a and b be in N. If b = a million, then define a + b = a' (utilising P1 and P2). If b isn't a million, then permit c' = b, with c in N (utilising P4), and define a + b = (a + c)'. then you certainly ought to stipulate 2: Def: 2 = a million' 2 is in N by potential of P1, P2, and the definition of two. Theorem: a million + a million = 2 evidence: Use the 1st component of the definition of + with a = b = a million. Then a million + a million = a million' = 2 Q.E.D. be conscious: there is yet another formula of the Peano Postulates which replaces a million with 0 in P1, P3, P4, and P5. then you certainly ought to alter the definition of addition to this: Def: permit a and b be in N. If b = 0, then define a + b = a. If b isn't 0, then permit c' = b, with c in N, and define a + b = (a + c)'. you besides mght ought to stipulate a million = 0', and 2 = a million'. Then the evidence of the theorem above is slightly distinctive: evidence: Use the 2d component of the definition of + first: a million + a million = (a million + 0)' Now use the 1st component of the definition of + on the sum in parentheses: a million + a million = (a million)' = a million' = 2 Q.E.D." Wow, he ought to be a real hit with the ladies...!! :)
2016-10-11 00:31:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the unknown is b write it as a 2nd degree equation
b^2-2c cos A *b +c^2-a^2=0 and apply the formula for thistype of equation
b= (( 2c cos A +-sqrt( 4c^2cos^2A +4(a^2-c^))/2
2007-12-10 11:27:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by santmann2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well first off you will have to isolate your variables or put it into a familiar form.
The quadradic equation form is Ax^2 + Bx + C and in this case your variable (x) is 'b'. Everything else is constant.
So... 0 = b^2 + c^2 -2*b*c*cosA - A^2 - subtract A^2
The first term is easy. It is everything that multiplies b^2 or 1
The second term is harder to see but it is everything that multiplies b so it is -2*c*cosA but not b^2
The third is everything else so is c^2 - a^2
So you have a quadradic where A = 1, B = -2*c*cosA and C = c^2 - a^2 and just to remind you.. the quadradic equation is
x = -b +/- sqrt(b^2 - 4*a*c)
Hope that helps
2007-12-10 11:32:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Christopher F 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
a^2=b^2+c^2-2bc(cos A)
write it in the following form:
b^2 -2bc(cos A) +(c^2 -a^2)=0
now use the discriminant for the quadratic equation
D = (2c(cos A))^2 -4(c^2 -a^2)
find b1 and b2 roots
b1 =(2c(cos A) - sqrt(D))/2
b2 = (2c(cos A) + sqrt(D))/2
2007-12-10 11:27:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋