English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i have a rticle saying that the citys department of education is trying to limit childrens web yse because of abbuse over other people in the net. example: the website myspace. is this with or against the ten amendmenst. i need a breif explanation. thanks you.

2007-12-10 08:49:25 · 5 answers · asked by Albar 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

they are trying to do this outside of school.

2007-12-10 10:19:20 · update #1

5 answers

its against the first amendment !
Freedom of religion, freedom of that you should be free to share your thoughts, speech, press, petition, and assembly

2007-12-10 08:58:56 · answer #1 · answered by jamie5511 3 · 1 0

School is a learning environment where one goes to get an education. It is not a playroom where a student can surf the web or chat with their buds or read MySpace.

Most schools have outlawed person computers and internet access. If students had half a brain, they wouldn't do it when told NOT to...then the law wouldn't be necessary... But, most teeners don't have half a brain....so the school must make rules and laws against it.

It is NOT unconstitutional to restrict internet access in school.

2007-12-10 18:00:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If they are trying to limit children's usage AT school (whether during class time or after school) they are allowed to do so, since from a legal standpoint they are "guardians" of the children while they are at school. They are also within their legal rights to try to encourage parents to limit their children's access to these sites. They can NOT tell people how they may live their own lives though. If as a parent you choose to allow your children to use these sites, it is your right as a parent to do so.

2007-12-10 19:45:13 · answer #3 · answered by missbeans 7 · 0 0

Schools can limit to any degree, what is viewed or used on their computer networks. They own them. Schools also have dress codes. Don't you think that is against any constitutional rights? Point is, they can control what goes on there.

2007-12-10 17:10:39 · answer #4 · answered by sensible_man 7 · 1 0

well that can be debated allot
some will say that it is to protect the youth
but some will see it as a barrier of free speech

personally i do not see how any of the ten amendments are broken

2007-12-10 17:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by Brandy 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers