I think Carlos Boozer is better because all Amare does is muscle people around. This ain't no WWE people. LOL
2007-12-10 11:32:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Amare Stoudamire is one of the more overrated players in the NBA right now. Proof, this thread. Carlos Boozer is one of the more polished players in the game and plays offense as well as defense exceptionally well. He has a decent mid range jumper and can play the 4 or the 5 well. He is a front-runner for the MVP this season, without question.
Amare Stoudamire is a force, but completely ruins the flow of the Phoenix Suns. He provides absolutely no defense in the post and gets abused by the likes of Duncan, D. Howard, and Boozer every time they match up on him.
Durability wise, they are basically the same. They both have missed a lot of games in the past.
2007-12-10 11:04:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by john w 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Amare Stoudemire
2007-12-10 08:53:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tough question. As far as size and toughness, Boozer. But Athleticism goe's to Amare. It depends on the style of offense you put each player on. Up-tempo favors Amare. Post up, Boozer all day. Sorry, that's the best answer I got.
2007-12-10 09:46:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by The GM 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Carlos Boozer
2007-12-10 09:18:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
the rustic team exchange into chosen slightly greater desirable than 2 years in the past, with 24 gamers. decrease back then, Amare exchange into basically improving from knee surgical operation, and hadn't performed basketball for greater desirable than a twelve months. no person interior the league knew no remember if he'd be the comparable participant he were. So i think of that Amare did no longer particularly get an furnish. The committee probable desperate that the possibility of putting Amare on the team in user-friendly terms to ensure him flop exchange into to vast. Microfracture knee surgical operation is fairly much never good on a participant's profession. i might additionally somewhat see Amare on the team. Frankly, Boozer excels on the NBA sport yet i myself do no longer think of he'd be that great enjoying worldwide ball. You never understand how a celeb interior the NBA performs interior the FIBA international Cup or Olympics, because of the fact the style of play is distinctive. There are adult men like LeBron who you recognize will do good no remember what. yet then there are adult men like Boozer who has no marvelous skills, yet on the comparable time rankings plenty and rebounds effectively. So bringing a guy like Boozer who's an all-around great participant is a hazard. on the different hand, all of us understand approximately Amare's athleticism, his up-pace sport. A participant like that should play worldwide ball because of the fact no remember what, a minimum of Amare would be bodily able.
2016-10-11 00:09:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by smyers 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both very strong players with their pros and cons but Amare is better in my opinion. Amare can drive hard and finish or suprise the D and pull up from mid-range. Boozer's midrange game isnt as good as Amare's but he is just as strong if not stronger. both great players but I'd take Amare (more of a team player)
2007-12-10 09:10:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ross 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, they are both equally experienced players. both were drafted in the same year [2002] so you can't judge off of that. both boozer and stoudemire play on fast-pased teams. however, i would have to say that based on this season, boozer is the better center. he has been more dominant on the boards and in the key. boozer has been averaging 25.1 points and 11.3 boards this season while stoudemire has been averaging 21.1 points and 8.5 boards this season. this and last season have been breakout seasons for boozer. however, for boozers size and dominance, he should be getting more blocks. he has only managed 13 while stoudemire has blocked 32 shots.
regardless, boozer is still the better center
2007-12-10 09:18:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by sportzdude67 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Amare. But Boozer is a different type of PF. He has a more polished game and better shot. Amare is just a f*ckin beast who will dunk on you anytime he gets a chance.
2007-12-10 10:30:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by yo189 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree with you Amare is way better. Carlos is a good player but can't match up with Amare plus his face is just ugly (had to throw that one out there).
2007-12-10 08:16:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by sports fan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋