2007-12-10 07:30:29 · 14 answers · asked by hoobadooba 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I've actually heard a few people admit that they would vote for any woman that ran because they think we need a woman president. As much as I would like a female president, I will not make my decision based on a person's gender (or race or religion for that matter).
2007-12-10 07:34:42 · answer #1 · answered by Alli 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
bl_fkt: Granted Thatcher might have been "chilly hearted ruthless calculating scheming etc etc" yet she exchange right into a plenty greater desirable chief than Poodle or Bean, she exchange into two times the guy they ever have been or ever would be. I despise the Tories and each little thing approximately them yet Thatcher i'm getting excitement from. They way she dealt with the *spit* Unions, and the Falklands besides as rescuing the economic gadget from the previous Labour mess shows why she is plenty plenty a miles better chief, flesh presser and individual than our modern-day crop of s**t. Hilary Clinton doen't have what it takes to be a pacesetter of a rustic, she isn't chilly-blooded or no longer undemanding confronted yet she's definatley a scheming and calculating mutt, she could be like a woman Tony Blair, all mouth and no backbone. and supply it time all the corruption, sleaze, spin and hypocrisy will quickly floor.
2016-10-11 00:06:53 · answer #2 · answered by smyers 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I remember 8 years of Economic Prosperity when her husband was President of the USA. I remember the USA being in great shape when Bill was at the helm. I can't help but to think that some of her husband's great qualities as a leader are going to come across when she is elected. The fact that she is a woman, and that we've never had a female president is icing on the cake.
2007-12-10 08:04:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Obama is a world wide recognized American name for years to come. A black President who's mother is white.
2007-12-10 08:08:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I dont see a different possible reason to endorse her!
Ron Paul 2008!
2007-12-10 07:41:50 · answer #5 · answered by JOSH 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think maybe half of her support is composed of people that want her solely because she's a woman and/or they're dreaming of a stealth third term for Bill.
2007-12-10 07:40:14 · answer #6 · answered by nileslad 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Quite a few.
Lets face it, a lot of women are voting for her, just because she's female.
A lot of men are voting for her, just to prove they aren't sexist.
She's been playing the gender card so much that even Nancy Pelosi has called her out for it.
2007-12-10 07:34:00 · answer #7 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
yes, becuase if you know anything about politics, she has done very little good in the position she has now. She also has some crazy ideas. Did you know the feminists dont even support her.
2007-12-10 07:35:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. It's because she's Mrs. Clinton, and not Mrs. Rodham.
2007-12-10 07:35:39 · answer #9 · answered by DOOM 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
What other thing does she bring to the table?
2007-12-10 07:38:55 · answer #10 · answered by The Voice of Reason 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋