Because Al Gore wants to make money off it, so they have to call it that to justify taxing it. Al Gore admits this in his 'Inconvenient Truth' - right near the beginning he says he has been trying since 1982 to get a Carbon Tax.
CO2 is the fundamental NUTRIENT of our ecosystem. It feeds plants that make oxygen from it and grow on it so we can eat them.
With every breath you exhale, you help the plants grow! Your CO2 is very 'green'!
How does Al Gore stand to profit from taxing CO2 and from Carbon Offset payments? See for yourself:
2007-12-10 06:34:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by speakeasy 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
I wonder if Anal Cyst Limbaugh would be willing to to be sealed up in a room full of nothing BUT CO2 and see if he still thinks it isn't a pollutant.
We also rid our bodies of poisons through urine. Does he think urine should a cocktail ingredient?
Why is Rush the Retard still on the air?
2007-12-10 06:51:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
because a scientific researched done in the artic by drilling artic ice found that when the earth was hotter there was more co2 in the atmosphere and when it was cooler there was less.
thats like asking if we exhale co2 then how could it kill u?if u inhale enough co2 it will kill u buy sufication
2007-12-10 06:44:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andrew Crow 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well, oxygen can be considered an pollutant if it is in the right amount. Heck, plain water can be considered a pollutant if it is the wrong temperature.
We also produce feces. Those are pretty hefty pollutants. Yeah, so the we produce it means it can't be a pollutant is not really any kind of argument.
2007-12-10 06:36:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by A.Mercer 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
yup I even have splendid earlier ending my first marriage. I even had a buddy that became involved in helping me. yet i became in simple terms incredibly starved for interest, at a loss for words approximately my existence and nicely slightly curious. i did no longer prefer to wind up hurting her in my at a loss for words state so i did no longer enable something to start. She became candy and if i became going to alter i might provide her a decision.
2016-11-14 08:05:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by zeh 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
On the other hand, you may be surprised to learn that diatomic Oxygen is toxic to and detrimental to most cells. We have evolved very specialized structures to process oxygen and most of our body's cells have mechanisms to prevent them from being exposed directly to that toxic substance.
2007-12-10 06:37:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by outcrop 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think if we lock Rush Limbaugh in an airtight box along with all the hot CO2 he expells he will find out.
2007-12-10 06:36:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Monoxide is not the same as Dioxide.
Mainstream science is not in disagreement on this one.
2007-12-10 06:38:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Just wait until the Democrats propose a "breath tax" and see how funny it is then.
2007-12-10 06:45:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by cornbread_oracle 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
You shouldn't have said that, now it's open season on humans. The environmentalists will be armed to the teeth.
2007-12-10 06:35:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋