To give Al Qeada more support in their time of need?
The have gone on TV and declared "The War in Iraq is lost." and have gone unheard.
They have tried to set a timeline for US military pull out, and failed.
They have tried to pull funding for our US military when they are winning every battle against Al Qaeda, and have retreated from this position.
Any suggestions? What say you?
2007-12-10 06:15:42 · 25 answers · asked by T-Bone 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They can require the armed forces to only use non-lethal weapons.
But don't say that too loud, or they'll probably try it.
They'll put it under some bill named "the humanitarian act" or something like that.
2007-12-10 06:18:37 · answer #1 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 11⤊ 0⤋
Pelosi I can understand. She's a typical San Francisco Liberal.
But Reid is a different matter. He's become mentally imbalanced in my mind. He's a full blow BDS sufferer, and has essentially adopted a platform of trying to oppose President Bush as much as possible, and to hell with what's good for the nation.
2007-12-10 06:25:21 · answer #2 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
"But after all, the leaders of the country determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and then denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."
herman goering nazi leader
ur falling for the tactics of the nazi party thats calling the peace makers un patriot and helping the enemy
2007-12-10 06:25:45 · answer #3 · answered by Andrew Crow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They can send their Love Child-Sean Penn to negotiate with Al Qeada, he likes terrorists!
2007-12-10 06:22:17 · answer #4 · answered by elaine 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
They could give up the charade and don their proper attire, turbans and bathrobes for Reid and head to toe burka for Nancy.
2007-12-10 08:30:36 · answer #5 · answered by Mother 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They can be made to stand before an audience, confronted with audio and video evidence of their malice, and have to explain themselves.
Let's see how that works when we make the reckless take accountability.
2007-12-10 06:40:36 · answer #6 · answered by MrOrph 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Al Queda is not the problem in Iraq. Iraq is a civil war with some out of towners joining in the fun.
The only person directly giving support to terrorists right now is George Bush. He has boosted Iran's prestige to unprecedented heights, and has provided a training ground and a mission to terrorists throughout the world.
Nancy Pelosi should be thanked for trying to get us out of an unsolvable mess costing uncountabl billions and American blood.
You are grossly misinformed and the victim of propaganda on this situation I'm afraid.
2007-12-10 06:22:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If they meant anything they said, they would have stopped funding military operations (we're not at war, as it hasn't been declared. IMO, that's most of the problem.) in Iraq by now.
2007-12-10 06:25:26 · answer #8 · answered by DOOM 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Senator Harry Reid and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi must to the best of their ability respect the demands of the American People.
History will honor these 2 fine Americans.
2007-12-10 06:51:31 · answer #9 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Aside from actually joining Al Queda, there's not much.
2007-12-10 06:36:11 · answer #10 · answered by cornbread_oracle 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well they could start leaking top secret information to the enemy. That could cause more deaths of American troops and possibly win them more support in the anti-American movement.
2007-12-10 06:24:13 · answer #11 · answered by Mattymc323 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋