what would happen if countries and homes were ruled by women?

Answer 1

Countries and homes are already being ruled by women, and nobody's turned into a pillar of salt yet.

Answer 2

Women do not always run the home. What's to come of the broken homes with a father as the figurehead? That's how it is in my home. I live with my father (my brother also lived here before he got married) and he has always had the say. Even when my parents were together it was basically 'If you want to know go ask Dad." So I disagree with those who have said that women ruled the homes. Women don't run the countries, either. I'm not saying it's all men, but it's also not all women. Females today are getting so excited because we've got Rice as a political figure and now that Clinton is running for President....but the truth is that a woman will not win, and she will not rule the country with an iron fist. I'm not being a sexist pig either because I'm a female. I guess I've just been able to open my eyes and realize things that a lot of other women can't.

To be perfectly honest I don't want a woman running this country. I don't care if she went through 30 years of military life and has been the senator of anywhere - it doesn't matter. Men and women react differently to situations (like war, attacks) and to be frank men react better and quicker than women. That's my opinion, I don't care if I get thumbs down either.

Cheers.


ps - we wouldn't be shoe shopping and trying on dresses, dolt. Some women like browsing for guns and cars just like you men. That's the kind of sexist BS I'm talking about. It's so immature. Honey, you might as well just call it quits if you think that's how life would be if a woman was president. I'm quite sure all of your relationships have failed because you're that dense. Either that or you're with a really shallow woman who matches your personality.

Answer 3

Universal observation: If any person--male, female, E.T. or deity--rules anything without giving at least as much consideration to the real needs and desires of her subjects as she does herself, the result will suck. If women did it, it would suck in a different way than if men did it.

I've found that reeeeeeealy matriarchal societies, like Mycenae and those people everyone mentions in China, and some Amazonian aboriginal tribes, they're really quite stable and peaceable. They are also quite stagnant. The female system worked well enough (often better than neighboring states), and the state Mothers didn't see much need to fix what wasn't broken.
Anyone who's seen a guy tricking out a car or computer knows that we LOVE to fix what isn't broken. Male-led societies seem to make more technical progress, and occasionally hit on societal or governmental changes that surpass those of the more stable matriarchies nearby, but too easily go in the direction of conflict and oppression. They've won out in history because that technical progress along with the warlike tendency enabled them to smash any matriarchies they ran into, although doing so probably held them back sociologically.
My own wild theory: Male-minded civilizations merging with those "feminine" powers rather than conquering them would have produced an "offspring" government with, Darwin willing, the beneficial traits of both "Mother" and "Father" civilizations. As usual, the key is probably balance.

So I'll admit my maleness here and say that if women "ruled" as I think you mean, things would "even out" and improve, but only advance very slowly as support for pie-in-the-sky, fix-what-ain't-broken projects and reforms would be very small.

Answer 4

1. Nothing against for human kind. There was peace and silence. No over domination will also take place. Actually our present Indian President was an women, and congress leader is also an women, in home our mother ruling the family nothing differently occur now a days, what man rules betterly women manages the same in better way.

Answer 5

Haven't you noticed the overall tone of Western countries: the dead-end despair and weariness? The West is controlled by women. Meanwhile the manly Orient grows more powerful, laughs at us, and surpasses us in every way.

Answer 6

Just obverse the deterioration of society since the rise in single motherhood (in correlation with feminism) and you'll see we're already experience what it would be like to have countries & homes ruled by women...

I suspect that if women of today weren't so full of this 'you go girl' attitude, things wouldn't be half as bad. Alas, we're surrounded by yobs.

Answer 7

Women already rule in the home, always have. They're called homemakers right? They rule countries behind the scenes, which is really the best place to make change.

Answer 8

don't know about countries but certainly homes are ruled by woman only

Answer 9

Progress

Answer 10

We don't live in a patriarchy as feminists like to suggest. We live in a male-led matriarchy, and this is why the world is a cesspool.