A. Mumbai: a melting pot of all regions of India, each having their own ghetto/enclave; diversity in cultures -however, not a very friendly city to foreigners.
B. Delhi: Is still, essentially a city with North Indian flavour at its surface and core. Unlike Mumbai, which lacks a separate regional identity.
C. Bangalore: IT capital and a thriving pub/nightclub culture. Does that qualify it to be cosmopolitan?
D. Chennai: Not very friendly to non-Tamils. Very friendly to foreigners.
E. Kolkata: Decaying city but still very cultural at heart. Huge diversity in national/overseas influence and a thriving restaurant culture.
F. Hyderabad: Friendly to Hindi speakers. Good infrastructure but more or less, a second cousin of Bangalore.
2007-12-10
05:23:04
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Travel
➔ India
➔ Other - India