No that is not waqcked , lol. I think your correct, the governtment has things that we couldent comprihend in their knowledge. I know this sounds funny, but i beilve in that stuff to. I beilve anything is possible and are fantasy's are reality but we don't know about it yet. Their growing their minds, and this stuff is currently behind the scenes. But they have to keep it safe, if one person messed up something in the past the whole world could change from someone stepping on a mouse, or letting a new jerm from their body into the past. This is why Me and you will never see this , unless we or you join the governtment. They try to protect us , thats why is behind the scenes.
Tommy=14 years of life
2007-12-10 05:20:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, it's not wacked. science says that this is totally possible.. but finding a worm hole that can be used, and the technology to travel via the portal are the missing ingredients.. so, it is possible.. you should try to invent it. !!!
One note though: this is a quote by me:
---"I think that time travel will never be accomplished, because it works on the theory that all times run on a continuim (ie, past, present AND future), if this is the case, then we can assume that the "future" is actually happening right now, some where down the line of this continuim. And, If this is the case, then no one now or in the future has learned of time travel, otherwise, they could have already come back to our time and told us about it"...
2007-12-10 05:25:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
anything is possible.
if you read einstein's theory of relativity, he will explain exactly what it takes, lol, the problem is that few people can read his theory of relativity, it is so far above the heads of even extremely educated people.
the science of quantum physics is the science of the space time continuem. Max Planct is the founder of it and he and einstein shared a nobel prize in the early 1900's. try reading even some of their articles concerning this science, I did last night. i made it to the third paragraph untill i no longer understood what planct was saying.
it takes having a doctorial level (PHD) of education in several sciences to really have a chance even at understanding this.
For instance, Planct took measurement of time down to "10 to the negative 43rd" of a second. that is such a small measurement that it is only theory that it exists and no computer can yet measure that small. When he got that small, he found not another measurement, but thought and potential (God, inother words)
As far as black holes and worms ... we can barely send people to the moon and back. we cannot prove black or worm holes exist, but think they do, and there is not one even within this galaxy or any galaxy we can see, so we are a long way from finding one, yet. now, if we found one in this galaxy we are in, we would have to travel for hundreds of thousands of lightyears to reach the outer edges of this galaxy. So we would die long before getting just to the edge of this one, much less a different galaxy that we cant even see from space above earth.
We would have to have conquered travel through time, in order to reacy a worm/black hole, in other words, since if they exist, they are billions of years away from us.
2007-12-10 07:41:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by paigespirate 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
mad science!!! Yay .....its like drawing in a blank paper, nothing is visible until the next mark, so it's highly impoosible to build a time machine just yet. But who knows in the future, we will live to see it, since there will come a time the sun becomes so bright, everything on earth will be destroyed and ....and ....oopse, wrong subject! But the answer is still NOPE, NOT POSSIBLE!!!
2007-12-10 06:05:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mistie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's probably not that far off into the future. Someday there will be time travel, so the answer to you, is no. I believe in time travel, so it's not waqcked. lol.
2007-12-10 05:55:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by larry m♥ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i believe so im whacked also
2007-12-10 05:18:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by john c 4
·
0⤊
0⤋