Isn't that what free trade with China actually equates to.
2007-12-10 04:39:24 · 22 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
using the letter of the law type of concept, yes. Trade with China (free or otherwise) is technically an action of economic support to the chinese and communisim.
2007-12-10 05:03:51 · answer #1 · answered by TheGarlicButterSaw 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think communism means dictatorship. the same way I don't think democracy means anarchy, even thou both characteristics are very well related to each other. I think Cuba and China are a good and successful example of Communism even thou it brings some downs side. How come a country like Cuba, can present the performance that present in Olympics game ? Something must be done right over there, for other hand, democracy tends to bring freedom only tho those who can buy. If you don't have money to pay a good lawyer to fight for your rights and your freedom, democracy means nothing.
Republicans does not support communism they support tyranny.
2007-12-10 05:02:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, free trade with China supports Capitalism not Communism
2007-12-10 04:45:57 · answer #3 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Clinton signed the free trade aggrement with China, not Bush. My guess is that Clinton did it as a way to thank them for all the money the Communist Chinese government gave to his campaign.
2007-12-10 04:52:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
As an Independent, I feel that the Republican Party has grown closer to some form of Nazi type government – The current administration in particular as been building their policies on lies and propaganda rather than fact and truth.
The term "Communism" brings to mind a nation working for the betterment of it's people through cooperation - this is not what the Republican Party has been doing at all. Propaganda & lies… propaganda & lies. What bothers me most is, allot of people are falling for it.
2007-12-10 07:20:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Trading with China actually serves to undermine their state controlled economy.
Among Republican voters, however? Yes, they absolutely support state controlled economy for this country. They support massive expansion of federal jobs for themselves and support using public money to support federal contractors to provide them with jobs. They also support sweeping government intervention in the economy such as monetarist policies in the Fed, massive borrowing at the Fed level to put into private industry, massive regulation like immigration restrictions and massive protectionist measures against corporations.
2007-12-10 05:02:02 · answer #6 · answered by Lynne D 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
we don't! communism is an severe style of socialism. The Socialist ideology is a highway to failure! under socialism, incentives the two play a minimum place or are omitted completely. A centrally planned economic gadget with out marketplace costs or earnings, the place property is owned by potential of the state, is a gadget with out an effectual incentive mechanism to direct economic pastime. by potential of failing to emphasise incentives, socialism is a theory inconsistent with human nature and is as a result doomed to fail. Socialism relies on the theory that incentives do no longer remember!
2016-10-10 23:51:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Subsudizing the most wealthy makes me think of stuff you would hear about the Soviet Union and the Oligarchs, and the Republicans love subsudizies.
2007-12-10 10:19:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No free trade is a capitalist ideal.
2007-12-10 04:57:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
they do not support communism, but they do very much support communistic policies.
the old soviet union used to routinely violate the civil rights of it's citizens, as does china today - right wingers think that we need to all have our phones tapped, have our mail checked, and our e-mails monitored.
while at the same time, the vice president thinks that we shouldn't even know who attends his energy policy meetings or even who visits his house THAT WE PAY FOR!
that and the cronyism evident in giving away 'no-bid' (whatever happened to free market trade?) multi-billion contracts to companies with OBVIOUS ties tho high ranking govt officials very much smack of the entitlements that existed in the old kremlin and the current day chinese communist party.
these days, republicans are 'fighting' for the farm subsidies that currently go to hundreds of land owners in MANHATTAN who have not actually farmed in hundreds of years - not be suspended or even reviewed, while family farms all over the nation struggle and one by one, go under.
i could go on and on...
2007-12-10 04:43:01 · answer #10 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋