What?
2007-12-10 03:59:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
What does one have to do with the other? You don't need to even be s*xually active to be a good President.
We did have one single President---I forget which one----and I doubt he was fooling around because of the moral standards of his day.
It has nothing to do with the job that I can see.
2007-12-10 12:03:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
People seem to be upset at sexually responsive presidents so maybe an unresponsive one will be a good change.
2007-12-10 12:02:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If she is frigid in her response you must not be doing it right. Aside from this. Sheesh!!!!
2007-12-10 12:02:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by gone 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Come on, Alphabet. You're smarter than this question.
2007-12-10 12:02:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by cornbread_oracle 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
say what?! This question, as you should know, makes no sense.
2007-12-10 11:59:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋