English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-12-09 21:37:03 · 3 answers · asked by Miss Behavin 5 in Business & Finance Corporations

3 answers

Give it to Olivant (the only tender that preserves the business as a going concern whilst getting rid of the arseh*les that caused the problems .. .

Virgin is a fire sale / take-over (no doubt followed by multi-million 'golden good-byes ' to the existing Board and a well hidded assett strip, a rebranding (or closure) of all existing branches and bye-bye to most of the existing staff)..

Nationalisation will be a disaster = if there is ONE institution that is trusted LESS than the Banks it's the Government (would YOU trust your money to the Government ?)

2007-12-10 08:18:22 · answer #1 · answered by Steve B 7 · 0 0

No - now no longer some thing - incredibly the capitalists would be up in hands and be questioning that the proportion holders deserve their pennies returned.. which kinda defeats the factor of shares - truthfully all human beings is conscious they are in a position to bypass up or down and it incredibly is an danger - now no longer a pay off inspite of commercial overall performance.. the ecu won't like it the two.. the alternative is to install writing off public money and sell to own enterprise for inner maximum income at very low-priced fee.. the shareholders get threat to recoup their losses and the tax payer gets a demanding deal..

2016-11-14 07:07:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Virgin.

Please god not nationalisation! I can't believe how much tax payer's money has already been used to bail it out.

2007-12-09 21:41:35 · answer #3 · answered by Robin 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers