2007-12-09 19:41:25 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Worst then Bush?
Nothing wrong with Bush at all, in my opinion.
Hillary, of course, as she will stop at nothing to get elected, and will lie, cheat, and move to any state days before an election just to ensure she can be a viable cantidate. Oh, and I forgot to mention stay with her adulterous husband.
2007-12-09 19:46:32 · answer #1 · answered by California Boy 4 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Hillary Clinton
2007-12-09 19:44:48 · answer #2 · answered by Hilda S 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The next Bush will be
#1 Guiliani
#2 Hillary
same products different labels
2007-12-09 21:37:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Rudy Giuliani
2007-12-09 23:39:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton.
2007-12-09 19:44:52 · answer #5 · answered by Karma 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
That would be a tough one to answer. It'll be close but I'd say Hillary Giuliani or Rudy Clinton could give ole GWB a run for the money(no pun intended!).
2007-12-09 19:53:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
Gulliani, Romney, McCain would be worse if that's even possible.
Hillary, Edwards would be maybe just a wee bit better.
Better choices of the bunch. Obama, Paul, Huckabee, Kucinich.
2007-12-09 19:52:42 · answer #7 · answered by oldstyleman_2000 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Clinton
Obama
2007-12-10 01:38:27 · answer #8 · answered by LDS Mom 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i don't know about worse but all the republican candidates are running on virtually the same platform as him, and the Democrats are running on a bush light platform so they would all be about the same
except Ron Paul the only one offering a real change for the better
vote Ron Paul
the only wasted vote is for the status quo.
2007-12-09 19:52:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
There isn't one in either party who could be any worse than Bush unless it would be egomaniacal Giuliani.
2007-12-10 00:24:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋