2007-12-09 18:29:52 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Bottom line is..........Drew Brees has something to prove.....all year he has underperformed. Now he will showcase his talent all over the Falcons D. Atlanta is still in a rebuilding year which means they suck. Plus Bush should be out so Brees will really want to show everybody he is the main backbone of the team, not Reggie.
Saints -4
OVER
2007-12-09 19:05:38 · answer #1 · answered by pozitive thinking 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those are two of the most unpredictable teams in the NFL. The Saints recently were beat by the Rams, which was the first win St Louis had this season. I would stay away from this game personally. Without Bush and Deuce the Saints lose their rushing threat, but the Atlanta Defense will be on the field a lot because Atlanta's offense is horrible. I would have to say that the Saints will win by 10. Not a lot of offensive firepower either way, so the under looks to be the smartest choice.
2007-12-09 18:42:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saints 42
Falcons 14
2007-12-09 19:03:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Take the FALCONS and the OVER.
Reggie Bush = OUT
Saints have no running game, the Falcons do.
24-21 FALCONS!
2007-12-10 00:03:21 · answer #4 · answered by J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what a dog of a game. monday night football has been terrible this year.
take the saints and the under
the saints should win 24-10
2007-12-09 18:51:01 · answer #5 · answered by froggy_logic 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A potential train wreck of a contest, but ESPN deserves this late-season garbage. It is basically a battle of which team of quitters will want to get to the clubs faster later that night. The 2003 highlights of the WSOP will look real good by the second quarter....final score - Falcons 20, Saints 17.
2007-12-09 18:45:51 · answer #6 · answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Falcons and Under. The Saints suck and they are on the road. The Falcons suck too, but someone has to win, no Reggie Bush!
2007-12-09 20:37:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a long time Saints fan, but I quit betting on them years ago. You never know which team is going to show up. They scored 35 on Seatle and I thought they were back, but they came out and stunk it up against the Rams, we were their 1st win. So I would stay away.
2007-12-10 00:46:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't want to bet this game, but if I had to I would take the saints and the under.
2007-12-09 18:33:16 · answer #9 · answered by blibityblabity 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the geat unknown. logic sez the under, but redmen is starting. he may have a game in him. first time back up QB's tend to do good for a minute because there is no book on them. the aints turn it over some and have none of their starting RB's. colston will lock up with that CB for the falcons which should neutrelize him to some degree. good cover corners lower the points.
ok lets see....the game is in new orleans, right? i'll take the aints to cover the four. and i aint touching the over/under. if you make me, i go under 43.
2007-12-09 18:40:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋