English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Barak Obama : Consolidating and unifying the Blacks for political clout to change their plight.

Mitt Romney : Project at National level Mormonism as a reliable faith.

Hillary Clinton : Realisation of Equality for Women in national politics.

Honest comments please.

2007-12-09 15:43:46 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

They may not be openly publicising, but underlying reasons seem so. Barack Obama has taken help of Oprah Winfrey to campaign for him in the tree early states of Iowa, NH and SC, aiming to catapult himself to Numer One Democrat slot.
Mitt Romney has taken pains to clarify his faith in Mormonism and his loyality and commitment to American nation.
Hillary Clinton's case is already well deliberated and needs no enumeration.

2007-12-09 15:54:56 · update #1

Four Answers. Thanks folks.
TG: It is true all candidates taking all burning issues of the country very serously. But Winfrey Oprah expresses in her campaigns she is " so tired" with the status quo with the Washington affairs and so she advocates a change and some thing new. Can any one take less seriously great celebrity of Oprah's standing (daily keeping 90% of American women spell bound for hours )if she is so concerned

2007-12-09 16:43:50 · update #2

4 answers

No those candidates are running because they feel that they can lead the country as an American. I think many media outlets stress their differences but I think they would not run if they did not feel able to lead.

2007-12-09 15:51:58 · answer #1 · answered by DJTT 3 · 0 0

Well, I don't agree with your interpretation of the causes of the three hopefuls. Obama, in my opinion, is a socialist and possibly an atheist who has no idea what it means to be a black American.

Romey is probably a decent guy, and he certainly comes across well on television. I believe he believes what he's saying, but I don't trust him. Mormons are a very secretive subculture that appears loving and tolerant, but inside its walls it is controlling and sometimes vicious to people who dissent from it. I think Romney means well, but I think when all is said and done he may compromise what he thinks is best to please his religion.

Clinton doesn't care about women. She's like Obama in the sense that she has no idea what it's like to be an American woman. She is a socialist, and I am afraid of her. She is brilliant, charming and diabolical, which is not a good combination.

Those are my honest comments.

2007-12-09 16:01:03 · answer #2 · answered by No Shortage 7 · 0 1

I think you underestimate all the candidates. Certainly the effects you mention are likely to be one result if one of them wins, but it does them a disservice to portray them as so one-dimensional. Each of these people has a long career in public life and naturally shares most of the same concerns as other Americans. I see no reason not to believe that the issues they talk about are the ones they care about.

2007-12-09 16:03:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

as an indy i havent found any one to get my vote. so ad noone seems to care about the plight of the commen individual.

2007-12-09 16:05:19 · answer #4 · answered by freddfubar 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers