How do I determine if a case is a function of the federal or state court systems?

Question

How do I determine if a case is a function of the federal or state court system?

Second, how do I know whether a case falls under federal or state jurisdiction?

And lastly, what does it mean when they ask, "explain the differences between the jurisdiction and original venue for
each case?"

Thanks to all those who are willing to help me with these questions. I am trying to figure out a few cases and I am confused on these things. If you aren't willing to help, please don't answer the question. Thanks again!!!

To the first post, No, I don't want people to do my work. I am writing 5, 300 word essays about 5 different cases. I just wanted someone to explain this to me, since I didn't understand thank you very much. To the second person, thanks for clearing this up!

Answer 1

If you're talking about criminal cases, then it depends which law is being broken.

Many bad acts, though, violate BOTH sets of laws - see Michael Vick, for example, so it depends 'who files first'.

"Jurisdiction" refers to which court has authority to try a case, "Venue" refers to "where" the case will be tried.

Richard

Answer 2

You are taking law courses and want someone to do your work? If a case concerns a federal offense it will be heard in a federal court. If the offense is state in nature it will be heared in a state court. If an offense violates both state and federal law, the federal court has jurisdiction and the penalty is more severe, with no time off for snitching or good behavior.

Answer 3

The court docket has equivalent ability with the Congress and the President. they have that ability for a reason. that is in our shape. that is asserted as exams and balances. whilst all in government take place of work they swear on the Bible "to guard and look after the form". Now Republicans like Newt Gingslob prefer to take this u . s . a . decrease back 200 years. they think of Congress and the president might desire to over rule the final court docket. they want the President to have suitable ability. all people with even a million/2 a recommendations knows that's erroneous, that's un constitutional. The very document they swore to "defend and look after" the Republicans now make efforts to trash. BTW, any case could be taken to the final court docket for a try of "if it meets Constitutional regulation", the court docket in user-friendly terms excepts what they like to pay attention".