English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Before I say anything, let mae just say that these are facts SAID by people, resources include Loose Change, and many Youtube videos, you look them up. What do you think?
On 9-11, people inside one of the towers said that they had heard explosions from below the basement. One man had said that one of his friends that had come up from the basement was burned up. Firmen had also reported that there were explosions below where the planes had hit.
There has been a history of buildings burning, and 9-11 seemed to be the first building to fall the way it did. In the movie loose change, a tall building was hit by a plane, burned for an estimated 20 hours, and did not fall, however, more than half of the building was destroyed. On September eleven, a plane had hit, burned in a metter of minutes, and fell in a matter of minutes. Both buildings did. It seems to me that i dont know wheather to believe this story, or what the goverment says, you decide.

2007-12-09 14:31:37 · 12 answers · asked by Adeth4Told 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

If you truly wanted the truth you would not watch only videos like loose change but also those who go head for head against loose change.

There is one out there that actually includes every minute of loose change and points out the errors and discrepancies as it goes.

Try screw loose change and then see if you haven't learned something.

2007-12-09 14:39:34 · answer #1 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 3 0

Do you realize that not only would someone have to time these "explosions" just right, but the ENTIRE building would have had to be wired for explosives to work to the extent of bringing down a building that tall???

The explosions were from two things - the transformers blowing up in the basement (have you ever seen and/or heard one of those things????) as well as the steel gurding giving way under the weight of the concrete that was on top of it - the structuring was compromised by the planes crashing into the buildings!

Doesn't matter what is stated because there will always be someone that will have a theory and some reason that it is a conspiracy by the government. The true fact of the matter is that 3,000 lost their lives that day, and they are never coming back - no matter what the "truth" is. And do you honestly think that someone isn't going to go running to the press with their information??? I mean, something of this magnitude would be HUGE! Someone would have to unload that secret, and if this nation has learned anything, it is that people in DC can't keep secrets. For the number of people that would have to be in the know on this one, someone would have leaked it by now. And 6 years later, no one has said one word. I think it is safe to say that it wasn't a government conspiracy. The only conspiracy is in the minds of the ones that want the government to be responsible for this so they can move on with their happy little conpiracy-filled lives.

2007-12-09 14:51:16 · answer #2 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 1 1

You have to remember, the guys at loose change, started off saying that,

The plane that crashed in PA, had to have been shot down, because they found debris over 5 miles away at Indian lake.

Now how did the guys at loose change detwermine Indian lake was 5 miles away ?

The used Google Maps, and got the driving distance.

Like anything in the air, is gonna follow the roads on a map.

The actual distance, was like 3/4 of a mile.

They were to ignorant to figure that out themselves.

No airplane as large as those boeing airliners, have ever crashed into a building before.

Everyone always trys and uses the bomber from wwll that hit the enpire state building as evidence.

Except that bomber, was smaller than a current F-15 fighter jet.

Loose change, uses idiotic facts, like, the power was off 10 floors for a couple of hours to prove that they had time to rig the building.

Never mind, that every building demolition ever done, required months of work.

Or that somehow there were pools of molten steel, makes ya wonder why there weren't pools of molten aluminium, since the airliners and the outside the building itself, was made of aluminium.

They say the melted pools, that no one has ever actually seen, proves it was demolition.

Except they cannot point to melted metal at any demolition ever done , anywhere in the world.

You have to understand, these movies were made by two uneducated 20 year olds.

2007-12-09 16:03:17 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 0 0

Well to begin, the sources where your facts come from. You tube, loose change, people who some how counter fear and panic so well that they know exactly what's going on while their building is blowing up. You can't use them because they're not accepted by both believers and non-believers, and face it, they're too biased to be considered valid. Any pilot or engineer can lie about this stuff and there's plenty of reasons too. Some of the pilots who testified flew during Vietnam and alot of Nam vets hate the gov., so why not get paid for pay back?

There are only a few valid sources that can support the theory, but let's fight fire with fire- the same category of scientists who say it's a conspiracy are excessively outnumbered by the one's who disprove the theory (I think Popular Mechanics and Scientific America had articles).

But the best thing anyone can do is research both sides of the story as much as possible. Don't just listen to Michael Moore or Ann Coulter, consult the words of people and sources TRUSTED by most- and you're right, Bush isn't trusted, but I didn't mention him now, did I? You need balance, and if you're really skeptical, seek neutral sources or what those undecided are thinking.

If you don't pull out both sides in your arguments, then people will continue to think you're crazy (wink wink).

2007-12-09 15:00:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonimo 5 · 0 1

Both buildings fell a couple hours after they were hit due to the steel beams melting from the intense heat form the jet fuel. The building hit second fell first followed shortly by the building hit first.

These guys studied and tested and planned this attack for 8 years. They were here testing the weakness in our airport security.

Did those of you who think this is a 'W' plan know they have Airport Security Tape of the Security Screeners actually taking the box cutters away from the terrorist only to run up and hand them back to them as they walked toward the boarding area for their gate?

Are you aware 'W' ignored the PDB which warned him they were planning on using our jetliners as missiles flying them into our buildings. What did 'W' do? Nothing. He did not tighten security at our airports. All the nimrod had to do was to send out a memo to all Security Screeners that they are to confiscate all knives, box cutters, nail clippers, nail files and any other sharp object used for cutting.

2007-12-09 14:53:38 · answer #5 · answered by Tigger 7 · 0 1

this is purely an internet hoax. this is been going around for years. Flight seventy seven replaced into wearing sixty 4 human beings, no longer sixty 5 as claimed in this message. The message additionally claims that Flight seventy seven hit the twin Towers. in spite of the undeniable fact that, Flight seventy seven crashed into the Pentagon, no longer the worldwide commerce center. as properly, the e mail states that the "entire form of sufferers interior each and all of the hi-jacked planes replaced into 254". in spite of the undeniable fact that, this is untrue. numerous good materials concur that the completed form of persons on the hijacked planes replaced into 265. in case you subtract the 19 hijackers, the completed form of sufferers on the planes (passengers and team) replaced into 246 no longer 254. Neither 265 nor 246 upload as much as 11. consequently, claims of a few supernatural association between the terrorist assaults and the huge form 11 are blatantly contrived and enormously deceptive. the 2nd component to the message claims that financial disaster 9 Verse 11 (9.11) of the Islamic holy e book the Quran encompasses a startling prophecy possibly on the subject of the U. S. invasion of Iraq. in spite of the undeniable fact that, learn shows that the quoted verse does not seem interior the Quran in any respect. financial disaster 9 Verse 11 of the Quran is all in favour of repentance and charity. Abdullah Yusuf Ali's translation Of The Holy Qur'an, documents Verse 11 as: "yet (on the different hand), in the event that they repent, set up known prayers, and preparation known charity,- they're your brethren in faith: (consequently) can we clarify the indications intimately, for people who comprehend."

2016-11-15 02:30:26 · answer #6 · answered by read 4 · 0 0

Loose Change and YouTube? These are not CREDIBLE sources. Just because somebody says something it is not a fact, it's nothing more than a STATEMENT. Learn the difference or this world will be a very difficult place for you.
Would you like to buy a bridge?

2007-12-09 16:09:36 · answer #7 · answered by Jeff F 3 · 0 0

Yup, yup and . . . yup.

You'll get that whenever you pick the scab off a government coverup.

The truth is, Georgie didn't have anything to do with it. Neither did Cheney. They were new-hires at the time.

Put on your thinking cap, dude. The 'government' is comprised of literally millions of wonks and bureaucrats that keep their jobs in the agencies no matter who the new kid is in the oval office (and will only be with the company for 4 or 8 years).

Don't you think there's a good number of these permanent employees that are in positions of influence that would fetch a fair price? Am I saying some of them are bought and paid for! Heavens, could it be!

Money runs the world dear boy. The moneychangers who financed Hitler saw they were going to be stiffed, so they financed his opposition and made a windfall. But Hitler wouldn't have gotten off the ground without their backing.

Now consider the Islamofascists. How much money did it take to create 9/11. Grease a few wonks in key positions of in the US, make arrangements in Saud and bingo, the twin towers bite the dust.

Did you really think JFK was shot by a lone gunman?

The real enemy of America is the Federal Reserve Board, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank etc. etc. etc.

We won't be able to win the "War on Terror" (a ridiculous concept) until we bring down the Black Horse ridden by the moneychangers.

Only then can a real president actually do what it takes to win the war against Islamofascism, not just perpetuate windfall borrowing and spending for generations to come.

Oh, and you'll notice that after a question like yours (and an answer like mine), there's a flurry of stupid questions posted to push the question to the bottom of the pile so fewer people will read it.

2007-12-09 14:34:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

George Bush gave a speech at EXACTLY the time and place that he was ADVERTISED to speak on 9/11, after the attacks. IF it was a REAL terrorist attack, WHY weren't he and hundreds of schoolchildren EVACUATED IMMEDIATELY?

Read Operation Northwoods, the de-classified US government memo from the 1960's, which outlines plans to FAKE TERRORIST ATTACKS using COMMERCIAL and DECOY PLANES, so to blame Castro and trick the public into supporting a military invasion of Cuba. Sound familiar?

2007-12-09 14:43:45 · answer #9 · answered by gelfling 7 · 0 0

All that garbage has been de-bunked time and time again. The problem is that conspiracy wackos tend to ignore science in favor of some shadowy illuminati group that must control the desitny of the world. Kind of sad really....

2007-12-09 16:28:22 · answer #10 · answered by sammael_coh 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers