i know the answer of that trick question:
The roman number of 13 = X I I I
part that number by the half with a line:
so i'd be like this: V I I I = 8
So that's why 8 is the half of 13
Greetingssss¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ☺☻☺☻☺☻☺☻☺☻
2007-12-09 14:07:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
What Is Half Of 13
2017-01-16 19:31:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In base 13: 13 * 1/2 = 8; which is like saying 16 * 1/2 = 8 in base 10.
How you can find this out:
Since you know that the first two digits of any base x system will be x^1 and x^0 then you know that 13 = 1x^1 + 3x^0 = x+3 and 8=8x^0 = 8
(x+3)/2 = 8
x+3=16
x=13
We are in base 13.
2007-12-09 14:16:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by someone2841 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
All numbers are congruent in a way. As for 13 and 8 there are many ways that they can become equal to eachother such as X being how and 13 = Y and Z =8 then in difrent dimmensions X = Y+Z squared and that will equal the 4th diagonal dimension in which the cuantitative theroum (3-6) justifies that any number is 5 less than any number in the first dimension. Therefore X = 8/4D.
2007-12-09 14:15:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jack 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
DIfferent base? 13₅ = 8₁₀
2007-12-09 14:10:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by DWRead 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
In base 10 half of 13 is 6.5
In base 13 half of 13 is 8
2007-12-09 14:13:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by MartinWeiss 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Use Roman numerals. 13 in roman numerals is XIII. Cross a line through the middle horizontally (number is symmetrical) and then you get VIII, which in regular numbers is 8.
2007-12-09 14:22:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
each slice might desire to shrink the cake in 2 halves and each shrink might desire to be perpendicular to the others. shrink the cake alongside a diameter (all human beings) you at recent have 2 equivalent products. shrink alongside a diameter it is perpendicular to the 1st one (you gets a ninety diploma attitude on the centre) This cuts each previous piece in 2 equivalent components, offering you with an entire of four equivalent components. Now, the trick is to get the 0.33 shrink at ninety tiers from different 2 'concurrently'. the in undemanding words way it is recommended to do it is to shrink the cake in 2 halves: one precise and one backside. the acceptable circle might prefer to be the very comparable length because of the fact the backside circle, and each might have 4 equivalent products (from the faster cuts). complete = 8 equivalent components. 2^one million = 2 (one shrink = 2 components) 2^2 = 4 (2 cuts = 4 components) 2^3 = 8 (3 cuts = 8 components). interior the journey that your cake became cooked in 4 dimensions, it is recommended to locate yet yet another 'prevalent' shrink (meaning: perpendicular to all of the others) and additionally it is recommended to then get 2^4 = sixteen components. yet I truthfully have in undemanding words seen 3-length cakes so a protracted way... --- in case you're allowed to bypass the products between each shrink: one million. shrink alongside a diameter. 2. Take one one million/2 and located it precisely on precise of different one million/2. shrink alongside a radius at precisely ninety tiers from the unique diameter. 3. Take the two products from one factor and stack them on precise of different 2 products. you at recent have a stack of four quarters. heavily shrink alongside a radius that bisects the ninety diploma attitude. then you definitely have 2 stacks of four products, every bit being one-8th of the cake. you're able to shop on going as long as you go with (in some unspecified time faster or later, the crumbs get extra advantageous than the products...).
2016-11-14 06:25:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by ross 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
impossible in this universe.
Half of 13 is 6.5.
2007-12-09 14:16:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by nerris121 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Logically, it's 6.5, not 8, however, is it a riddle, or what?
2007-12-09 14:08:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋