In the event of the tie - the law remains the same as the lower court rules. No action by the supreme court has taken place.
2007-12-09 14:00:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Beau 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's nine justices. No cance of a tie unless one is ill. even in most of those cases, the sick judge will render an opinion from home, in most cases.
Here's information on what happens in the rarest of occasions when a 4-4 tie does happen...
"Although rare, 4-4 ties are hardly unheard-of—justices do recuse themselves from time to time. A split decision effectively upholds the ruling of the lower court (presumably a state supreme court). In the event of such a tie, the court typically issues what's known as a per curiam decision. The opinion in such a decision is issued under the court's name, as opposed to consisting of a majority and a minority opinion. Justices, however, may attach dissenting opinions to the per curiam decision if they like—as happened in Bush v. Gore."
2007-12-09 14:03:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by chocolahoma 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the event of a tie in the Supreme Court, the case is settled by a game of "paper, scissors, rock" between the plantiff and the defendant.
2007-12-09 14:01:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
definite, there may be a tie. as an occasion, a courtroom member dies and the replace has no longer yet been chosen and ratified. interior the form of tie votes by way of the acceptable courtroom, the decrease courtroom's ruling interior the case being seen is upheld devoid of remark. In different words, the acceptable courtroom subject concerns no everlasting determination on the guidelines in contact interior the case.
2016-11-14 06:24:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by ross 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There could be a tie if one of the justices is sick or recuses himself/herself. In the case of a tie, the ruling that is the subject of the appeal stands. In other words, whoever filed the appeal loses. The lower court's ruling that was appealed remains unchanged.
2007-12-09 14:01:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There can't be a tie because there is an odd number of justices - one justice can't have 2 one-half decisions. So the question is moot - it can't happen.
2007-12-09 14:06:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
that is why there are an odd number of justices
2007-12-09 13:59:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by joe f 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
that is why there are nine there can be no tie
2007-12-09 14:30:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
0⤊
2⤋