English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Apply whatever circumstances suits your imagination.

2007-12-09 13:56:25 · 14 answers · asked by ___ 5 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

14 answers

if you put it in, it's not platonic

2007-12-09 14:10:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

"When a man and woman do fall in love—assuming that each is romantically free and the context otherwise appropriate—sex is a necessary and proper expression of their feeling for each other. "Platonic love" under such circumstances would be a vice, a breach of integrity. Sex is to love what action is to thought, possession to evaluation, body to soul..."

2007-12-10 05:58:34 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Wizard 4 · 0 0

Give us a minute, and i will take the dilithium crystals from my phazer plug them in the warp drive, and go back to the seventys in my time machine, on impulse power. am a lttle bit to long in the tooth for a crush. garry

2007-12-10 11:21:59 · answer #3 · answered by G 5 · 0 0

ughhhh do not like them hehehe its like a fantasy in your mind that does not go anywhere a friendly fascination or lust for another hehehehe.................

I want the real thing no crushes true LOVE and enlightenment heheheheI know this is not always easy but it can be achieved between man and woman love in its truest form connected not only to the beloved but all man kind with God :)))

2007-12-10 11:03:55 · answer #4 · answered by Rita 6 · 1 0

I think that its a slightly contradictive statement, but.. I think there are all diffrent types of crushes. That you can have a longing for someone who you can never possess. So in that context you can definatly have what you mentioned. I think it would drive you into obsession perhaps.. Or madness..

2007-12-09 22:28:37 · answer #5 · answered by ~{The Contessa}~ 2 · 0 0

Great..they make me feel alive and platonic crushes can be fun..

2007-12-10 01:50:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

by the term platonic, it just merely denotes, in my opinion, more of respect and appreciation of the person, than anything.

it is not love.. or maybe it is in a much lower degree or depth..

2007-12-09 22:24:40 · answer #7 · answered by oscar c 5 · 1 0

"Soul Mates and Twin Flames," Elizabeth Clare Prophet, and "Sexual Force or the Winged Dragon," O. M. Aivanhov, are good re this.

kind regards,

j.

2007-12-09 22:06:28 · answer #8 · answered by j153e 7 · 0 0

Why not? You could be attracted by the personality/intelligence/wit etc., constantly wanting to spend time with him/her, without any physical desire towards that person.
Sounds possible!

2007-12-09 22:50:09 · answer #9 · answered by RAJESH 2 · 0 0

Humans need each other in varying degrees.

2007-12-09 22:19:22 · answer #10 · answered by hmmmm 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers