Let's say your at a debate for gun control, and you are asking questions that are supposed to make the other side sound bad (this is for school). I need to ask a question that makes having lenient gun control sound bad
ex: Guns kill thousands of people each year, how would making the gun control laws more lenient help this?
2007-12-09 13:30:58 · 8 answers · asked by anon. 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
just to make this clear, I want to make gun control soun good, and less gun control sound bad. the example is a question I want something similar to.
2007-12-09 13:49:33 · update #1
I think you're up a creek without a paddle. Gun control won't take the guns out of the hands of criminals. It will just disarm good law abiding citizens who want to defend themselves.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government". I can't think of any good reason for taking away our 2nd amendment right.
2007-12-09 13:57:40 · answer #1 · answered by jfoste1 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
who do you think should have guns, the criminal, the law abiding citizen, the police the government guns dont kill murderers kill even if all guns would be destroyed from the earth as we know it some person woud kill with another type of weapon , and you would be back to square one as long as theres humans inocent life will be wrongfully taken its not the weapons but the evil which is incontrollable in man. you need to jump on other side
2007-12-09 13:38:23 · answer #2 · answered by zoro 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about... If gun control is going to save people from dying shouldn't we also pass laws that make shooting people against the law so these criminals will stop killing people too? (Answer. we already have laws against killing people) Oh so criminals don't care about those laws but you are expecting them to obey gun control laws? Hey just as long as the inocent victims can't defend themselves that is what is important right?!
2007-12-09 13:39:53 · answer #3 · answered by Matt 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Guns don't kill people - people with guns kill people. The problem is people, not guns. If owning a gun is made illegal only the criminals will have guns because criminals do not obey the laws.
2007-12-09 14:39:23 · answer #4 · answered by Bette 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the gun control laws were less restrictive, there would be more armed citizens on the streets to deter, or defend against, armed crime.
Richard
2007-12-09 13:40:33 · answer #5 · answered by rickinnocal 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Any attempt at gun control will just limit the guns to the police and criminals.
2007-12-09 13:35:19 · answer #6 · answered by seriously omg 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's been proven many times over that more gun control does not equal less crime (washington D.C, New York...etc) and allowing law abiding citzens to carry firearms in public does not equal more crime (Florida, Texas...etc)
2007-12-09 14:55:36 · answer #7 · answered by Crazyjester9 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
there is not one good reason to ban firearms from good people.
2007-12-09 13:37:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋