2007-12-09 12:17:30 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Anthropology
I think they won't recognise you. You have to some kind of an official member or something. But Anthropology is already available.
2007-12-10 01:20:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would love to have a separate biological anthropology and cultural anthropology. One is a science, the other is a humanity (for the most part).
2007-12-09 19:46:50 · answer #2 · answered by High Tide 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Isnt this catagory think to be for all varieties of rock?Thats stupid to exclude it in basic terms when you consider which you dont like.in case you dont like the quesion then dont answer it,its that straightforward.You each physique is making this entire conflict between the emo's far greater complicated than it may well be.Now, in case you place steel in u . s . a .,then that is a few humorous $hit and and far greater surprising.
2016-10-02 07:55:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You could post it in the "Yahoo" section. However, if you want to split it, I don't see it happening. Only rarely are there more than 60-80 questions at a time up on this section, while other sections have hundreds.
wl
2007-12-10 04:06:59 · answer #4 · answered by WolverLini 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, aren't you in the Anthropology section now? In the eyes of the layman, anthro and archaeology are the same anyway! lol
2007-12-09 12:20:31 · answer #5 · answered by Abby O'Normal 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they have anthropology, but archaeology would be a nice sub-category
2007-12-09 18:03:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'll sign on if you can find out how to do it!
2007-12-10 01:43:55 · answer #7 · answered by beth l 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont know but I like it!
2007-12-09 13:06:28 · answer #8 · answered by tha_g_child_2000 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋