English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Our soldiers are getting killed and maimed protecting our country. How can anyone think of cutting off the funds in the middle of a war? CAll you congressman and senators to tell them to fund the troops.

2007-12-09 11:32:32 · 4 answers · asked by ningis n 1 in Politics & Government Politics

4 answers

congress PLANS to fund the war.

the signature on the veto will be george w. bush and no one else.

it is he and he alone who stands between the troops getting what they need.

all he need do is sign order for their money...

2007-12-09 11:38:14 · answer #1 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0 4

What is the logical flaw in your statement?

Our soldiers are getting killed and maimed "protecting our country" (<---- Right there's a logical flaw). How can anyone think of cutting off the funds in the "middle" (<---- logical flaw) of a war? Call "you" (<--- logical flaw right? "your") congressman and senators to "fund the troops" (<--- logical flaw) .

Logical Flaw #1: Our soldiers are getting killed and maimed not for our country but for Iraq's country. A bunch Iraqi's (Only 10% of attacks on Americans come from Al-Queda) are killing our soldiers! Why should we defend them if all they are going to do is murder each other and those who freed them?

Logical Flaw #2: Were not in the middle of a war. The war was fought and won already. (Remember "mission accomplished"?) We are in the middle of an occupation as a security force for Iraq's government. An ill Iraqi government that is doing jack **** to stop the violence besides hide behind our soldiers.

Logical Flaw # 3:It's not you it's your, unless English isn't your primary language.

Logical Flaw #4: Were not funding the troops in their best interest or our country's best interest. The troops and country's best interest would be to fund the troops in fighting Al-Queda where they are re surging (Afghanistan/Pakistan). If we send more money for this fight to continue we are only supporting our soldiers deaths and Iraqi incompetence. As a tax paying citizen, I will not pay for either without a loud fight and a shout. I call my congressmen and senators daily to tell them I think they should not fund our soldiers deaths and Iraqi incompetence. It's in the form of "support the troops" but it's really "support the troops getting killed for Iraqi incompetence".

2007-12-09 11:55:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

That is how the Viet Nam war ended. Congress stopped the funding. FBI proved that Saddam and his his country has absolutely nothing to do with the events of 9/11/2001. We are in a unholy (anti-Christ) and unjust war.

2007-12-09 11:39:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I don't know about logical flaws, but I see a few grammatical ones, and a whole heap of bias.

2007-12-09 11:37:48 · answer #4 · answered by Tom A 3 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers