He's famous and has a lot of money, they don't
2007-12-09 10:54:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Far Beyond Driven 7
·
13⤊
9⤋
MEDIA POOP! What gets me is that some of the very same people who b*tch and moan about the lying media were so quick to buy into the garbage spewed about MJ.
I can't understand why people can't grasp that there was NEVER enough evidence that came anywhere REMOTELY close to proving that MJ was guilty of ANYTHING he was charged with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Written by Marcus Lamar Walker
June 25, 2006
ask.yahoo.com
Regardless of how we feel about it, Michael Jackson is innocent. Flip the script. (The following example is hypothetical, please don't take it seriously... it's just that... an example.)
For example, you're at school and James has a pen and is using the pen. When James isn't looking, the pen falls on the ground. James looks back, and the pen is gone. James says that you took the pen. James looks behind him and asks Laurie did you take the pen. Laurie says yes because she doesn't like you. But the pen fell on the floor!!
This was just an example, but use it in Michael Jackson's scenario. The facts of the most recent case.
-Gavin spent several months at Neverland with Michael, his sister, his brother, and his own mother!
-They did spend in the night in Michael's room (as most of the kids that stayed at Neverland)
- There is NO proof that Michael gave alcohol to the minors (no eye-witnesses). The witnesses that they had in the case were not creditable.
- There is NO proof that Michael molested that child. Remember the DNA evidence they took in December, 2004? Remember the matching fingerprints on the magazines? Remember the internet cache of the porn sites? NONE of this was creditable and linked Michael Jackson either molesting this child or doing anything improper with this child.
SO HOW can you convict a person based on the evidence at hand. Use the example of James and the pen. He accused you of doing something improper without having the necessary evidence to prosecute!
Making an argument that he is guilty because he is weird, strange, and what 47 year-old-man likes to play with children other than a pedophile. Michael Jackson, by the evidence, is neither a pedophile nor homosexual. Please people, look at the evidence before you convict someone of anything improper.
Below is a hyperlink to the detailed facts of the case: Michael Jackson v. People of California
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson_case
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Was Michael Jackson Framed?
The Untold Story
Mary A. Fischer
GQ, October 1994
Did Michael Do It?
The untold story of the events that brought down a superstar
Before O.J. Simpson, there was Michael Jackson—another beloved black celebrity seemingly brought down by allegations of scandal in his personal life. Those allegations—that Jackson had molested a 13-year-old boy—instigated a multimillion-dollar lawsuit, two grand-jury investigations and a shameless media circus. Jackson, in turn, filed charges of extortion against some of his accusers. Ultimately, the suit was settled out of court for a sum that has been estimated at $20 million; no criminal charges were brought against Jackson by the police or the grand juries. This past August, Jackson was in the news again, when Lisa Marie Presley, Elvis’s daughter, announced that she and the singer had married.
As the dust settles on one of the nation’s worst episodes of media excess, one thing is clear: The American public has never heard a defense of Michael Jackson. Until now.
It is, of course, impossible to prove a negative—that is, prove that something didn’t happen. But it is possible to take an in-depth look at the people who made the allegations against Jackson and thus gain insight into their character and motives. What emerges from such an examination, based on court documents, business records and scores of interviews, is a persuasive argument that Jackson molested no one and that he himself may have been the victim of a well-conceived plan to extract money from him.
More than that, the story that arises from this previously unexplored territory is radically different from the tale that has been promoted by tabloid and even mainstream journalists. It is a story of greed, ambition, misconceptions on the part of police and prosecutors, a lazy and sensation-seeking media and the use of a powerful, hypnotic drug. It may also be a story about how a case was simply invented.
Go here to read the rest of this article- http://www.buttonmonkey.com/misc/maryfischer.html
2007-12-10 07:13:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by SINDY 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because people's opinions are controlled by the media! The media tells them that Michael Jackson is a child molester, a psycho, and a bad father... they don't see the truth that he is a musical genius, a NORMAL guy (as normal as he can be since he is the most famous person in the entertainment industry), and a carring and loving humanitarian who really just wants to see children not suffer.
♥We Love You MJ♥
2007-12-10 05:21:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Because they are so gullible that they believe all the false allegations and the media's lies! If they would actually take the time to do some research then they would see what a great man he is but it's their loss!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2007-12-10 00:03:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
unfortunately when people reach the type of success he has, they are going to be a lot of haters(jealous) and a lot of people want to take advantage of his fame, kind heart, and yes tons of money!
in some ways, he is a victim of his own talent and success
I LOVE YOU MICHAEL!!
2007-12-10 00:23:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
People love to leap forward and pretend offense at others' behaviors. I guess it is how they massage their self esteem (ego). Look how they treat Lindsay, Paris, Madonna etc even Elvis for gosh sake.
2007-12-09 10:58:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by andyg77 7
·
8⤊
2⤋
although he is a talented musician he seems to have this one annoying trait about him......he likes little boys to much, and in this society we dont really care for drug dealers or sexual predators
2007-12-09 11:50:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I don't hate him...but i wools like some music
2007-12-09 10:56:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by JOHN 7
·
10⤊
2⤋
because he is so good at buying children and if you don't understand then you must be too ,it is sick to be a Michael Jackson fan he must be boycotted forever
2007-12-09 11:00:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by evander 3
·
1⤊
7⤋
Well for me personally its the fact that he outbid Paul McCartney for ownership of the rights to the Beatles' music coupled with the irresponsible parenting (like dangling the baby off a ten story building) Oh and the serial pedophilia and subsequent cover-up... yeah that's about it... Oh and the fact that he's spent more money than I will earn in my lifetime on plastic surgery doesn't help either.
2007-12-09 10:57:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by eggman 7
·
3⤊
10⤋
because he is a pedaphile and no one likes a pedaphile well except you obviously. . . .
2007-12-10 02:07:07
·
answer #11
·
answered by Love United 6
·
0⤊
3⤋