Who here thinks that G.W. Bush needs to be impeached?

Question

He has done numerous things against the law that are impeachment-worthy. But then we get Cheney. So I say, we kick them both outta office!

Answer 1

I whole heartily agree with you and I have written so several of our senators asking why Bush is still in office and the answers I get aren't worthy of being used for used toilet paper so the latest thing that I decided to do was to contact them again and this time I thanked each of them for allowing Bush & Cheney to remain in office so not only are we living is fear of our own deaths but for all those who gave their lives for nothing and not just our own people but for every country too. What's the use of saying that we truly want these monsters out of office because no one gives a da-n about what "We the people want" anyway.
And as for the answer that the Democrat's have secured endorsement of Al Queda for presadential nominee is about as stupid as begging both Bush and Cheney to stay in office for another 8 miserable years.
I may get bashed for my answer but it's how I see it and also what I believe to be.

Answer 2

When you can come up with the evidence of whatever crimes he has committed, then by all means, impeach him. But just because you don't like his decisions or just flat out hate the guy is not cause for impeachment. Had the evidence existed, I'm sure the democrat controlled congress would be more than happy to give impeach him. However, impeachment doesn NOT mean removal from office. Remember Bill Clinton? So even if you do impeach him, he will still be there.

Answer 3

You are evidently ignorant of the fact that impeachment and removal from office are separate processes. Based on that, I deduce that you probably think President Bush declared war on Iraq, which is not within his authority, and therefore an impossibility.

I'll forgo asking you to name one thing he's done to warrant impeachment to remind you that, if a President or Vice President is removed from office (or leaves for any reason) the President appoints the new Vice President. And there's no way they would both be removed at the same time. Theoretically, Vice President Cheney could resign from office, and the President Bush could pardon him of any perceived wrongdoing, and then appoint him as Vice President.

Answer 4

Those numerous things need to be investigated to see if impeachment is in order. If that happened, one or both might resign before the impeachment becomes necessary.

Answer 5

Well apparently 70%+ of the nation does. But why waste our time on that, from what i understand it is a complicated and lengthy process since there is no single event that would be able to get him out. Only 1 year left with him...the process would probably take over that much time and then nothing else would get done in the house and senate because no one seems to be able to multitask anymore!

Answer 6

the actual situation is that it takes a 2/3 majority interior the Senate to get rid of Bush and Cheney from place of work. The Democrats would desire to impeach him interior the homestead, yet then he'd nevertheless be in place of work. there is not any way the Republicans are going to throw Bush out of the White homestead and hand it over to the Democrats--that would desire to be political suicide. without being waiting to get rid of Bush and Cheney from place of work, impeaching him could appear as if no extra advantageous than a partisan vendetta, a political circus, like Clinton's impeachment regarded. Clinton's recognition reached its maximum element throughout his impeachment! Over 70%! And it became in no way below fifty 5% after that. Nancy Pelosi is not any fool. She is conscious this. So impeachment is 'off the table'. interior the meanwhile, the Dems are investigating many of the misdeeds of the administration, and each examine is popping up relatively undesirable stuff. each rock they have became over so a techniques has had stuff below it. Bush's recognition maintains to plummet, and Republican congressinal leaders are taking off to worry for his or her very own seats, and are taking off to distance themselves from Bush. daily Bush maintains to be in place of work he does extra injury to the Republican occasion. faster or later, Republicans in Congress could choose for they had be extra helpful off without him. whilst that happens, he would be impeached in a week, or he will stop. With Nixon they worked out a deal. They went after Agnew first and allowed Nixon to %. Agnew's successor. this type the White homestead stayed below Republican administration. That became significant to them. If that happens this time, Cheney will pass first, Bush gets to %. some reasonable-finding Republican to swap him, and the guy will sail by his Senate affirmation. So if Cheney quickly declares his decision to retire 'for wellness reasons', you will understand the approach is beginning.

Answer 7

This is an old issue that has been asked and answered dozens of times. Your claim that Bush has done numerous things against the law is a false claim. Name one case as well as the law that was broken.

If you don't like Bush, just say so and get it over with. Don't waste our time rehashing OLD GARBAGE!

Answer 8

Such an extreme statement requires above average specificity. You specify nothing.

Because this is irresponsible hate speech, and there is nothing. It just gives comfort to Al Qaeda.

The Democrat Party has already secured the endorsement of Al Qaeda for its Presidential nominees.

Answer 9

It might not be possible, but I'd sure like to watch.

Removing a crook from office is about the most patriotic thing we could do. Al Qaeda wants our way of life to be changed so GW is the perfect president for that.

Answer 10

You're kidding right? He's done nothing to be impeached for. Your handler is misleading you again and next time, take notes so you can write out your reasoning instead of lame "numerous things".