I watch WWE and TNA and there is no comparison between the products. While the WWE has fallen since the old WWF days, it is still far superior to the TNA product. It is amazing because TNA has so many of the most talented former WCW and WWE performers but just doesnt use them right and puts on a very poor production, not to mention that their announcers and non wrestling talent are low rate.
2007-12-09 10:11:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The WWE is better as far as production there is no doubt about that. But I don't think they are better in other areas. I think TNA puts on much better matches. That is the strength of TNA. I like wrestling and I llike both styles. I don't really worry about production quality. I like watching video of ROH matches and that is not good quality. I also like watching some old Japanese matches and that is not good production on the older stuff. As a true wrestling fan I think the matches are more important than some of the other stuff.
2007-12-09 18:26:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by komets.geo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even with the lows that WWE has sunken to, there is no comparison. TNA is just a plain old joke. I have no doubt that the guys are athletes, I just think that they are modeling too many of their characters after 80's WWE characters.
2007-12-09 18:16:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by zelocokitty 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
TNA Is made up of WWE rejects, why watch the TNA throwbacks when I can watch the real deal
2007-12-17 17:21:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by J Truth 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
TNA has all of the WWE's has beens
2007-12-09 18:50:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by kim_in_craig 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
WWE has better TV deals, production, merchandising, & mass appeal.
2007-12-09 18:15:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cena's hiptoss 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It made sense and had good booking.
2007-12-09 18:14:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋