Parliamentary vs. Presidential systems of government?

Question

I am looking for similarites and differences between the two systems - I want to make sure my analysis is complete.

I have these already.

Parliamentary:
Prime Minister is not directly elected
No division of executive and legistlative powers
Seperate Head of state and head of government
Executive power (PM) is accountable to the legislature
Stronger Party Discipline

Presidential:
President is directly elected by the people
Division of legislative and executive powers.
Is both head of state and government
Is not accountable to the legislature.
Weaker party discipline (relative to parliamentary)

Please, if you have any useful input, addddd.

Answer 1

If you haven't looked already, look in the US constitution.

Answer 2

Parliamentary Vs Presidential

Answer 3

I would say that your comparison is a good one for the US vs British systems. I'm not sure that "Separate head of state..." is true of all parliamentary systems by definition.

In Britain, if there is a vote of no confidence, they call an election, right? In the US, we have scheduled elections every four years. As a corollary to that, the PM's term is determined by the people and events, while the President's term is fixed.

In the US, the President can't be elected more than twice, while in Britain there is no such limit.

My impression is that the Parliamentary system, or the British people, support more than 2 parties. While in the US, whether its because of the people or the institutions, we have just 2 real parties.

Answer 4

nicely, the platforms are not too distinctive (different than an excellent Minister is the two vice chairman and Pres by potential of our standards) basically nevertheless, you're soliciting for a distinction between Britain and united statesa.. Britain isn't certain by potential of a shape, basically an unwritten code of ethics that they do no longer destroy - very nearly ever. united statesa. is ruled by potential of a shape that's continuously challenged (and greater comfortable than Britain's unwritten code)