In fact, I would hardly call launching an unprovoked war of aggression "interference".
More like war crime. But the question is the same.
2007-12-09 08:12:41 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh, well, if it's already been "decidered"...
2007-12-09 08:17:59 · update #1
Allies who fight terrorists are not terrorists.
But they are not actually allowed to fight them, because that would hurt the war on terrorism.
Understand yet?
2007-12-09 08:20:51 · update #2
Cause we're the good guys!
Cause Bush said so!
I'm surprised they haven't yet called Turkey militia 'terrorists'!?
2007-12-09 08:17:14 · answer #1 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 8⤊ 7⤋
I would say it has everything to do with intentions.
Some of the uninformed say we are there to lay claims to Iraq's oil...nope, M.E. oil makes up for less than 5% of our imports...and Iraq is just one of many countries in the M.E. we import from. Our interests there are geo-political, and are primarily there to contain Iran.
Iran's intentions are to destablize the region, thereby threatening the world's oil supply which means the global economy. Now before you get all self-righteous on us...with a holier than thou art attitude, this is more than SUVs...its $10/gallon of gas that will cause food prices to sky-rocket and the poor to be come destitute.
So, while this benefits Iran, it is debilitating to the World...therefore, Iran is bad. And our intentions, while also self-serving...do also yield some good to the collective good...which makes the lines between the two here a little clearer.
As for unprovoked...perhaps you forgot to read the 14 UN Resolutions Iraq was in violation of that warranted our actions....
Opps! Must have missed that. Well, when you do, let me know because then we have an intelligent discussion
2007-12-09 17:27:15 · answer #2 · answered by Kiker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My thought about that question why America could interfere in Iraq's internal affairs is that America is trying rebuilding the Economic and politic system and if Iran did some kind of interference, it only can have one direction...make proposals to train terrorists to kill all people that work on Iraq for good.
That's why!!!
2007-12-09 16:32:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, if you need an explanation. Here goes, you see after the Gulf War, Saddam Hussein signed this thing called a treaty. A treaty is an agreement reached to end agressions in a war. Now, Saddam basically snubbed this treaty for over a decade, while the UN sat around and did nothing.
George Bush, using intelligence that suggested Saddam was making WMDs launched a war against Iraq for possibly making WMDs and for his refusal to adhere to the terms of the treaty he signed.
Now, with Iran, Iran is sending funds, equiptment, and fighters to Iraq to attack American troops. That's called adding and abbetting. And also labeling them terrorists seems to fit nicely.
2007-12-09 16:52:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
America has been screwed up since the start. The people who run this country are double-standard.
2007-12-09 16:34:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
why is it ok for the US to interfere in the affairs of dozens of countries all over the world? Our bumbling around with the opinion that we know best, that we have the right idea and the right to push it, that everyone eles is wrong and lost, the poor dears....is making us less safe, more disliked (at least), and more likely to get into to a fight.... we need to come home and mind our own business.
2007-12-09 16:31:51 · answer #6 · answered by amazed we've survived this l 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Last time I checked we weren't paying people to bl;ow themselves up...We weren't DELIBERATELY targeting women and children...if that did happen we went after the offenders....
We did not behead people on TV...
But I have seen you post many times and you never let facts get in your way...I also have come to the conclusion you have not heard of a terrorist group you don't support.....
Someday MAYBE...but I doubt ......it you will learn to tell fact from the fiction garbage you believe from.... moveon .org...
and all the others determined to weaken the US.
2007-12-09 16:32:17 · answer #7 · answered by Try Reality 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
It isn't. America is being run by war criminals.
Seriously...
2007-12-09 16:55:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
the united states is not bent on nuclear destruction of the free world with the intent to us it. the latest report CLEARLY states iran wants to keep that door open. You want to trust them, thats your choice. I prefer to stay alive as most conservatives do. the choice isnt pretty but its survival. Surely you can understand that and our choice to live and prevent an extremist from bombing us has little to do with terrorism.
2007-12-09 16:22:24 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 7⤊ 4⤋
Because its America, they think they can roll into any country, but when its another country..theres gotta be something wrong....its a neo-consverative view is it not?..in a sense that its making people afraid of Iran, thus making them a *common enemy*..just like the Soviet Union back in the day..
Just paranoia
2007-12-09 16:20:38 · answer #10 · answered by livethinme 2 · 5⤊ 7⤋
Good question. A terrorist called by any other name is still a terrorist.
2007-12-09 16:18:12 · answer #11 · answered by Just my opinion 5 · 7⤊ 7⤋