clinton allllllll the wayyyyyyyyy
2007-12-09 07:15:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by ladysosureone 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dismal choices. I would vote for some third party. Anyone would be better than those 3. Huckabee wants to replace all federal taxes with a sky high sales tax on everything but stocks and bonds. Americans who live from pay day to pay day would be taxed for their entire salary. The extreme wealthy could escape paying any tax on most of their income. Think about what the wealth distribution would be in 10 years of this tax system. Look for Clinton to come with another Janet Reno type Attorney General to kill and jail Americans with unpopular political beliefs. All three will continue our tragically expensive involvement with Iraqi affairs. All three will do nothing about the Mexican invasion.
Your assertion that Southern men will not vote for women to hold public office may be an idea in your head but it is not a fact. The reason there are few women in public office is that the major parties do not run them. Here in Texas, the 2 major parties have only ran 3 women for governor. One almost won and the other 2 won. They have only ran one woman for US Senator. She has been elected and reelected many times.
2007-12-09 05:38:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'd rather see Obama vs. Huckabee, because in either case Huckabee would lose, and I'd rather see a liberal like Barack than a socialist like Hillary.
Notice, I don't say "less of two evils." But Barack is the lesser of two undesirables.
Vote for Rudy!
2007-12-09 05:39:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rick K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably Obama vs Huckabee because they both have the highest percentage. Personally, I hope Huckabee would win since I agree with him on a lot of issues and I like his whole idea about vertical politics. :-).
2007-12-09 05:48:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Clinton vs. Huckabee, I like Huckabee, but I just don't think he comes with as much as Clinton does...experience, Bill, experience, power, and did I say experience?
2007-12-09 05:29:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Obama vs Huckabee. I would vote Obama. If it is Clinton vs Huckabee I will have to switch parties and vote for Huckabee. A vote for Hillary is like voting for a female Bush.
2007-12-09 05:33:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Just my opinion 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
in the e book 'Freakenomics', a PhD in economics from MIT did a learn on the impact of money on election effects and located that it had little or no impression. His findings have been that money and an election win weren't a 'reason and impression'. He desperate that usually, yet no longer continuously, the money went to the candidate with maximum attraction and that, of direction, the candidate with the main attraction gained. So it grow to be attraction, no longer money, yet 'attraction' is puzzling to impossible to quantify. variations to the quantity of money prompted the share of votes for a particular candidate by making use of a few million%. no longer likely to bore you with the small print, even if it grow to be an thrilling learn that made countless sense. So, base line, it will bypass to who ever has the main attraction and the excellent message. attraction and 'message' gets out in spite of money and in spite of money, a foul message will die on the vine.
2016-10-10 22:10:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets be serious for a moment I don't think America is ready for a man of color for president. I mean any ...Indian, Asian...just not yet...too much racism exist .
Clinton neither because Americans are afraid of a woman in office as well...But i think she's ready and whip this country into shape just as a good woman would do....
2007-12-09 05:51:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anaiyah M 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would prefer Clinton. Obama--as nice as he is--can not win the general election.
Huckabee is experiencing a temporary boost in popularity for the moment, voters however will not elect another "Fear Of God" candidate.
2007-12-09 05:33:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Either scenarios, Huckabee doesn't have a chance against either one. If the Republicans want to keep the White House they better nominate Giuliani, he's the only Repub that can sway some Dems.
2007-12-09 05:31:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Clinton v Huckabee! No one with 1/2 a brain will vote for Clinton! So that way we know there will be a Good person in the office!
You couldn't get me to vote for Clinton if she were the only on one the ballot and I had a gun to my head!
2007-12-09 05:31:11
·
answer #11
·
answered by renee70466 6
·
2⤊
6⤋