Like a Marilyn Monroe, for example. Then she could use her sex appeal to manipulate men everywhere, and establish world peace... What do you think?
2007-12-09 04:23:02 · 19 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Heh. Yeah. What does it say about the sad state of women in the world when we CONTINUE to value their looks over their brains and personalities and experience. Sickening.
Women are HUMANS and they're INTELLIGENT. Hello.
2007-12-09 04:33:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, women who are smoking hot are not thought to be very smart.
Madeline Albright was not smoking hot; however, she did an outstanding job as Clinton's Secretary of State.
Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir would not be on my top ten babe list either, but they both were successful statespeople for their respective governments.
Everyone acknowledges that Hillary is intelligent; possibly the driving force behind Bill's presidency.
However, partisan infighting has put Hillary in a vulnerable position because she is the threat; that should be a testament to her legitimacy of candidacy.
2007-12-09 04:30:40 · answer #2 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, the last femme fatale that I can think of that was a ruler was Catherine the Great or Cleopatra so I'm not sure looks is a deal maker. I mean look at Margaret Thatcher for goodness sakes.
2007-12-09 04:33:00 · answer #3 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's not the responsibility of the United States of America to "establish world peace". In fact I would go to war right now with fellow AMERICANS who would interfere with my right to liberty, and they do exist. If you don't feel the same, get out of the way. We don't need collateral damage.
BTW I'm a female, and not an unattractive one...And don't we already have a smoking hot girly in the White House?
2007-12-09 04:27:36 · answer #4 · answered by Socion 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
All a woman needs is a large piggy bank and her finger on the Big Red Button...then the men around the world will bow down.
2007-12-09 04:33:59 · answer #5 · answered by Mizz SJG 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Marilyn Monroe is a bad idea for a president as well.
2007-12-09 04:27:35 · answer #6 · answered by Jade 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No I don't.
I think a "smoking hot" woman would have a worse chance of becoming president.
2007-12-09 06:26:07 · answer #7 · answered by georgia_peach 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, probably. it's REALLY sad if that is true, but it probably is. good looking people probably have a better chance. but it really gets me, because men as a general rule would just THROW AWAY what they thought on political issues and intelligence for looks. it's hideously obscene. there have been some VERY intelligent, VERY good female leaders in the past. take a look at Queen Elizabeth for example! not elected, but she was a brilliant leader.
2007-12-09 04:35:18 · answer #8 · answered by Maddi 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think she would have a better chance if she was smoking intelligent, smoking experienced, and cared about her country more than her ego and bank account. Does such a woman exist? This certainly disqualifies Clinton.
2007-12-09 04:36:18 · answer #9 · answered by jim h 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Most women leaders in history have been real dogs. Golda Meir, Margaret Thacher. So no. It's better to look like Hillary. lol
2007-12-09 04:28:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋