English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

OK numba one they are lyers they didn't see every nuclear facility
there are 1200 of them. The Iranian president says the American empire is falling, they say they want to destroy the jews then i saw the american/jewish flags burning u tell me what there intentions are. WE all could hate on bush but he did protect us from terriost attacks. The only problem is we invaded the wrong country.

2007-12-09 03:50:01 · 3 answers · asked by luisg 1 in Politics & Government Politics

3 answers

This is just your 'a priori' conclusion, and it's the same approach Republicans always use; Bush must be telling the truth, therefore everyone who opposes Bush's version MUST be LYING!

Evidence, in your world, is not required. Just a conclusion.

And, ya know... that's just plain goofy. :)

2007-12-09 04:02:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Actually, from what I have read, many people are missing one of the major points of the NIE report.
It actually confirms that Iran did have an extensive nuclear weapons program in place before it was halted.

And what people don't seem to realize is that there is the possibility of a nuclear program being RE-started, especially since there was one previously in place.
We certainly hope that the report is actually right but it is still wise to be very cautious when it comes to Iran.

So, I disagree with your characterization of the report's authors as liars as well as some of the responses that you have received.

2007-12-09 22:58:55 · answer #2 · answered by BMCR 7 · 0 0

The burden of proof should always be on any President for a war where troops are committed.

The Iranian president panders to his people, no better than Bush.

2007-12-09 12:09:04 · answer #3 · answered by Stewie Griffin 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers