What evidence suggests "terrorists" started 911?

Question

I accept anything other than a fire proof passport, a fake will, and a fake video tape. Also, I dont accept "because they are crazy or stupid or terrorists". If you cant give an actual firm piece of evidence, dont answer and watch "loose change"

Edit: Im reading your answers, all i get are insults, still no evidence. Some1 said their confession, thats never enough. Whenevers someone confesses, we still at least have more investigations dont we?

Edit again: still nothing...

If its such an easy question, then answer it somebody

What happened to WTC7?? fire brought it down??

Answer 1

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8129564295534231536&q=911+mysteries

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8129564295534231536&q=911+mysteries
http://youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc&mode=related&search=
http://video.google.com/videoplay?

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fYWIT9TSJPE&NR=1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6675390271410892226&q=physics+professors+wtc&total=38&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=2
Sorry. They removed the crash site photos of flight 93 where it shows nothing hit the field in Shanksville. The Fox news video above is all that's left. Curious? Here is all that is left of the pentagon photos. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9HrwTONo4k&NR=1

Answer 2

An alleged miracle. Madrid isn't so a ways away, and Lisbon is even nearer. Did people there see the solar approach the Earth or dance around? Is there any point out of this in Lisbon newspapers the subsequent day, announcing it have been seen in Lisbon? Madrid? Any city interior some day's march of the alleged journey? What approximately Santiago de Compostella, the alleged website of the relics of St. James? If I observed some thing like this i might think of there improve into some thing quite odd happening. i might additionally think of certainly one of two plausible even with the undeniable fact that no longer likely actual factors if i assumed approximately it long adequate. An inversion layer interior the ambience is the 1st ingredient that springs to strategies, even with the undeniable fact that it might desire to no longer be that. extra possibly - how a lot of those contemporary actual observed this? what proportion observed no longer something yet have been confident some thing occurred because of the fact they predicted some thing and that they have been advised it occurred? what proportion observed no longer something and stored their mouths close the two out of "stable manners" or concern that they may well be overwhelmed up for being an "atheist" by ability of people who theory they observed some thing? what proportion theory they observed some thing yet no longer the solar shifting? what proportion ducked like everybody else did and observed no longer something? super crowd, wating for some thing to take place. advised it might take place at midday. Any association between the solar and midday? some duck because of the fact they're the two mischievous or think of they observed some thing. something achieve this besides. by ability of they time they arise it is throughout. somebody starts off shouting with regard to the solar shifting.

Answer 3

I have watched "Loose Change". There are a few questions they raise that have not been legitimately answered, but other than that, they prove nothing either. In fact, they are very misleading. Most of the theories have been firmly debunked.

Two of the hijackers were reported as suspicious on their practice flights by a well known actor. These two hijackers were also video taped before boarding the plane on 911. There are pictures of people picking up parts of the airplane at the Pentagon. People witnessed the plane hitting the Pentagon from the highway. Pieces of flight 93 were found.

I agree there should be another, in depth, independent study about 911 but I do not believe the government orchestrated it.

Answer 4

Hi Gentdelbarcelona,

I say that yes, terrorists were responsible for 9-11.

As proof, I offer the Wikipedia definition of terrorism. You will see that each aspect clearly meets the definition. Furthermore, those acts were not accidents. I would go so far as to say that it would not be possible to carry out those attacks that happened on 9-11 without being terrorists.

"Terrorism in the modern sense[1] is violence or other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians for political or other ideological goals.[2] Most definitions of terrorism include only those acts which are intended to create fear or "terror", are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants. Many definitions also include only acts of unlawful violence."

(Full quotations cited on source below.)

Go down the checklist. Every following item fits the criteria:

The events that transpired that day clearly were violent

They were harmful to civilians

They involved political or ideological goals

They were intended to create fear

They were perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack)

They deliberately targeted or disregarded the safety of non-combatants

It also falls under the description of unlawful violence.

I therefore logically conclude that those acts could only have been accomplished by terrorists.

julie j

Answer 5

Here's the evidence that terrorists did it:

The terrorists came to US and lived quite well on money sent over by Osama Bin Laden. This flow of money has been traced. They lived here for years and hundreds of people saw them and have been interviewed to re-construct their movements.

We also have records of their visas and passports.

While here, the terrorists took both flying lessons & lessons in fighting, preparing for the attack. Numerous witnesses said they visited clubs and enjoyed themselves to a limited extent.

Here’s a picture of a well-dressed terrorist at flying school, published in National Geographic. http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/inside911/gallery_terrorist_ziad_jarrah.html

The terrorists were on the manifests of the 4 doomed jets and video cameras caught them as they boarded the jets.

On Flight 93, 37 phone calls were made. Many of these described the terrorists.

Their arab voice was captured on the flight recorder of Flight 93 just before the plane crashed. In Arabic, you can hear them asking if they should “bring the plane down” (crash it) and then "Allah is great” over & over.
===============================
AL QAEDA:

Al-Qaeda is the self-admitted agent with documented motives. In 1993, they attacked the WTC using a truck bomb and they were behind the attack on the US in Mogadishu. In 1996, Bin Laden issued a fatwa (basically a declaration of war) against the United States. In 2000 al-Qaeda bombed the missile destroyer U.S.S. Cole near Yemen, killing 17 servicemen. They bombed trains in London and Spain, and have been active in Algeria, Somalia and Kenya, Pakistan, etc, etc. The 20th terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui, admitted guilt in court.
====================
THE PASSPORT

There's nothing strange about the passport surviving

There were thousands upon thousands of mementos, papers, artifacts, wallets, jewelry etc that was returned to the families.
========================
THE COLLAPSE OF WTC7

I don't understand why people wonder why WTC7 collapsed when it's known that 7 other buildings in the area were destroyed by the collapsing towers, some of which were farther away than WTC7

Buildings destroyed on 9/11 (in addition to the towers):

WTC7, The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_attack#Damage

As for WTC 7:
According to NIST "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." See http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7

WTC7 was only 400 feet from WTC1. Since WTC1 was over 1300 feet tall, as they peeled away, the large perimeter columns from WTC1 struck WTC7 & many other buildings with terrific force due to their high starting position. Archival photos shows perimeter columns lying on the ground up to WTC7. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

In addition, WTC7 was built straddling a Con-Edison substation. This meant that its walls had to carry a tremendous amount of force and were vulnerable to impact. In addition, WT7 contained numerous fuel tanks for generators, some holding 6000 gallons of fuel, & this contributed to its destruction.

Finally, at least 6 fires started in WTC7, each of which was described as “large” but there was no water to fight them. The fires were left to burn because the building started to lean and firefighters decided it was too dangerous to enter.

Workers testified that the east side slumped, then collapsed, pulling the rest of the building with it.

See NIST’s (National Institute of Science & Technology) description of the collapse of WTC7 at
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_062907.html

Answer 6

You have the MULTIPLE ADMISSIONS of Osams....You have the ones that died's trasining records, There is loads of REAL evidense....but you libs want to believe anything that is anti-us...so there is no use debating someone whom is shown something real..wants to imagine the false....PS the makers of the movie you are so sure is true....admitt it has been altered...

Answer 7

You're right. Something tells me that Bowser and his evil henchmen, the Koopa Troopa, were behind 9/11.

Answer 8

How about 19 terrorist hijackers that killed 3000 Americans on 911, or do you think this is also untrue

Answer 9

How about their ADMISSION that it was them?

There is no credible evidence for any other crackpot theory about the 9/11 attacks.

Answer 10

I would think their confession is pretty solid as evidence.