If you don't have the $$$ guess what will happen to you....?
No Iranian will be crossing the ocean with a camel
and remember how Iran used to give US politicians gay lovers in the 20's-70's
2007-12-09 02:36:06 · 14 answers · asked by The One 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ha, ha, ha!
Bushco has trained its members to believe a camel riding muslim is more of a threat. They will never agree with you.
2007-12-09 02:45:32 · answer #1 · answered by MadLibs 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Please read your own question. What would happen if we didn't have any energy corporations or pharmaceutical corporations? Now ask what would happen if we didn't have any more Muslims riding camels in Iran? The current administration in Iran is completely different from the 1920s-1970s, now they kill anyone that is suspected of being gay. Do you support this?
2007-12-09 02:42:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not Iranians on camels, but Saudis are the worst enemy followed closely by Bushists. Although many of them are one and the same.
Corporations are not the enemy, they just naturally get out of control without close regulation
2007-12-09 03:05:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Muslims & Iran asside, it's odd that companies making available life-giving/saving fuel & drugs would be considered an enemy by anyone. Try doing w/o and let us know how that works out for you.
2007-12-09 02:48:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Muslims are not the enemy. Extremist/terrorists that happen to be muslim are. Exxon/etc and investors are a large enemy - they are costing Americans large amounts of money. Let's look at oil. Say it is 95 dollars a barrel. 60 dollars is the actual price, 35 to 40 dollars is investor worrying.
2007-12-09 02:43:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
with the aid of fact giraffes are truly tall creatures and it would be an prolonged fall happening. As for zebras, i assume you will could seize them and try against them nonetheless. something's achievable, while i became somewhat youngster I used to attempt to experience my unfavourable dogs like a pony.
2016-11-15 00:31:38 · answer #6 · answered by konen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with your statement, But they are both dangerous. One is an immediate threat, while the other has long term goals.
2007-12-09 02:40:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They lied about Iraq, now they are lying about Iran, and the war on terror is a hoax. 9/11/2001 was an inside job. VP Cheney was in command of the Operation.
2007-12-09 02:42:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
I can earn the money. I can't avoid an ever-growing group of human beings who want "Death to America".
(They also hate Israel. And the Western world. And each other if it's not the right 'tribe'. Who do they NOT hate?)
2007-12-09 02:41:20 · answer #9 · answered by pgb 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i don't fear muslims riding camels, i don't fear exxon at all, we need them, and as far as pharmaceutical corporations, they brainwash doctors and media, but i think for myself so i don't fear them either.
2007-12-09 02:54:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Both are high level threats.
Big corporations just have better advertising.
2007-12-09 02:45:26 · answer #11 · answered by Al a voter 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋