Help me out here guys. An AK-47 fires the same bullet as a .308 hunting rifle. Both are semi-automatic. An M-16 fires the same bullet as a .223 hunting rifle. Both are semi-automatic. The weight of the AK and M-16 are not much different from their hunting rifle counterparts. The length of the AK and the M-16 are not much different from their hunting rifle counterparts. The .308 and the .223 do hold fewer rounds, well unless you buy a bigger clip that is. The point is, what's with this whole ASSAULT rifle thing? The only real world difference between that mall kid's AK-47 and a .308 you can buy at Wal-Mart is that the AK is packaged all fancy to look tough and intimidating. Now, (and this one is for you gun control guys) that AK was firing military full metal jacket ammo. It leaves an exit wound about the size of a Quarter. My 300 Magnum with 200 grain core lokd ammo will literally cut you in half. I bought it and the ammo at Wal-Mart. If that mall kid would have had MY gun, NO survivor
2007-12-09 02:20:21 · 4 answers · asked by speed__phreak 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
It's just a tag name that liberals use to make guns sound worse. Clearly, they have no clue about the mechanics of many of the guns they rant about.
2007-12-09 03:27:01 · answer #1 · answered by Freethinker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals hate freedom and know that "assault" weapons are needed to defend our freedom, so liberals scream that "assault" weapons should be banned. That's part of why I bought an M-14, Mini-14, and 3 Glocks to go in my gun safe with all my hunting guns. I also have a .300 Magnum. I killed 2 deer with it in the last week. Guns feed people...
2007-12-09 02:37:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What kind of sick, demented mind would actually boast about owning a machine that "will literally cut you in half" and that would allow "NO survivor"??
Apparently gun ownership is some kind of macho thing that proves "mine's bigger than yours", just like guys who buy Hummers can say "mine's bigger than yours" or guys who buy sports cars can say "mine's faster than yours". It must be some kind of 'small penis' syndrome that helps these kind of macho men compensate for all their other inadequacies.
The Constitution allows us the right to bear arms in order to protect ourselves against a tyrannical and oppressive government, not as a means of showing off our prowess and ability to murder people.
-RKO- 12/09/07
2007-12-09 03:20:59 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The liberals are giving "handgun bashing" a break. Whatever is in fashion at the moment.
2007-12-09 02:33:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋