I was in my high school's library during lunch when a business call came in. I am starting a company, and on the other side was a venture capitalist calling. I answered the call, taking it outside (it would've run out by the time I got out, and she isn't known for answering calls), but had the phone confiscated. My iPhone has confidential venture capitalist files and data on it, and the executive director said that it was illegal for them to confiscate the property, which her lawyers justified as larceny, which is registered property of the Silicon Valley Venture Capital Roundtable. Their rationale is since I had answered the call, I was, according to my contract, on company time and thus at the time of confiscation, an employee on public property. Does this follow through? I'm in California under the Fremont Union High School District, in case any specifics need be cited. I'm trying to keep this from escalating, but I want to know if the case is rational and legal before getting in.
2007-12-08
19:41:35
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I'd like to clarify a few points. First, our district's rules expressly state that cell phones are prohibited during class time, but that they are okay to be used on campus during brunch and lunch. I am reviewing the case, and the fact that I am in the library, where we can talk (how else would we use the computers, interfacing areas, etc), so its not a nuisance to anyone.
2007-12-08
19:55:24 ·
update #1
Few more points that just came to my attention. (1) Our library has practically phased out books; it is now an area for collaborative work both domestically and over our video conferencing centres, for networked computer work and a place to securely connect our laptops, pdas, etc. (2) As an open-campus and free campus during lunch, I can exist on campus, legally, dually as a minor and an employed agent. (3) I talked to my former employer, In-q-tel, a government intelligence firm, and they said that as an incorporated minor, my rights exist first and foremost in the interests of the corporation, then the investors, and finally the public government entity. I'm not sure, however, on how our district rules conflict with our schools' rules, because the district rules are in my favor, but the school seems to have tried to supercede the district...
2007-12-08
20:35:06 ·
update #2