English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

we certainly don't need arrogant self-serving people from this point on, talking to us like were stupid.

What will they be like as a public servant. Giving power to people who feel like they don't have to answer to anyone but themselves is scary.

2007-12-08 18:08:38 · 10 answers · asked by LindaAnn 4 in Politics & Government Elections

10 answers

Yes, corrupt is the word.

Clinton is already accepting the most money from lobbyists and special interest groups for her campaign. These lobbyists are the reason Bush's presidency has been filled with corruption and distrust. I'm sure he would make better decisions without the money being flashed.

Obama, however, accepts a very small amount from these lobbyists, and refuses the offers, for the most part.

2007-12-08 18:18:41 · answer #1 · answered by John 4 · 3 2

It would be nice however the corruption goes deeper then the President, Congress has become very corrupt indeed. My state California is putting on the ballet a bill which will require our electoral to include a two thirds formula via the popular vote so that our Representatives start representing.

2007-12-09 02:13:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Corruption must be eliminated by not voting for candidates who have lots of supporters that will later influence the government in giving in to their business proposals.

2007-12-09 04:59:27 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

Agreed.

2007-12-09 02:31:48 · answer #4 · answered by Frank 6 · 3 0

Yes we need someone in that's strong, honest and a gentleman like, well Obama. Take care.

2007-12-09 04:53:52 · answer #5 · answered by R J 7 · 2 0

They will not be public servants.

Maybe you should consider voting for the candidate who has turned down his congressional pension.

Roy Shivers does a good job summarizing the candidates...This is a Great song. =)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdV7YsM-N50&NR=1.

2007-12-09 02:20:07 · answer #6 · answered by soulinverse 4 · 1 1

I agree that they both would do our country equally no good.

And hopefully California if finally going to make things fair by having a split vote. The Dems have had it their way to long.

Go Hunter -

2007-12-09 02:12:51 · answer #7 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 3 2

I completely agree with you. that's why I want Huckabee to win. He not corrupt and hes completely down to earth.

2007-12-09 02:23:25 · answer #8 · answered by random person98 2 · 3 1

You hit the nail on the head! I'll take anyone but those two! I don't want more of the same!!!

2007-12-09 02:14:25 · answer #9 · answered by Working Man 6 · 3 2

Did you mean "rampant enough....?"

Who do you support? Ron Paul?

Vote for Rudy!

2007-12-09 02:21:13 · answer #10 · answered by Rick K 6 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers