How are these two things U.S. foreign policy and the notion of American liberty consistent?

Answer 1

They are not. If another country came here and told us we were in the wrong we would take up arms. On the other side of the coin, if we see some threat that doesn't conform to our ideal (whether real or imagined) we issue sanctions or invade. Can anyone say Iraq? If we continue meddling and wanting our way we are going to find ourselves without allies.
Bless,
Brother Reggie

Answer 2

I believe it is very important to see the consistences between the two. First look at what does American liberty mean to you. To me it stands for all that we are as Americans. Liberty, to be free. Living by the words of our countries foundation, the Constitution. By not letting the ultimate sacrifice of those who have chosen to defend this foundation go un noticed, or more importantly ever seem in vain. U.S. foreign policy being very consistent with this way of thinking. When dealing with foreign policy, we must always remember what we stand for. Sometimes that looks like putting our nose where it does not belong, but I think true Americans look at the intentions of the battle. We see opportunity to right a wrong, or set an example. It is very important to bring a strong passion about what American liberty really means when dealing with any foreign policy. To others it may look like we go out on a limb, but to Americans we know what it means to be truly free, and what it takes to maintain that.

Answer 3

Nicely loaded question here.

I personally believe that too much of my tax money goes to help other countries; hence my liberty is reduced.

Isolationism for America sounds damn near comfy; but Globalism is here to stay and you won't feed the world's people without resorting to free-enterprise capitalism. You won't have global commerce without a navy to protect the shipping lanes, either.

And I am also amazed at the attitudes of people who were so unwillingly removed from the security of their paternal leaders like Stalin and Hitler. Maybe we should all let them go back to Absolutism, and let the U.S. return to a policy of MAD and economic exclusion. Perhaps that will make the world happier with the U.S.

Answer 4

I tend to agree with Boomer. But, I would like to comment on the real problem. Our foreign policy is implemented by the State Department. Regardless of who is in charge of the Presidency and Congress, at the lower level, the State Department is a Bureaucracy. As such, all its employees are lower case fascists, because that is the nature of bureaucracy. This creates a built-in bias against foreigners who desire freedom for themselves and their country and a tendency for local fascists to receive support from the state department lower echelons. What I'm saying is that it is always easier and safer career-wise for a bureaucrat to deal with one strong central leader than it is to pursue a policy that requires dealing with the many diverse opinions and positions that freedom entails. Freedom is messy. The result is a bias against freedom fighters and in favor of fascists and deals that actually favor American Empire building instead of alliances with newly free countries. The only way I can see to cure this is to prevent the bureaucracy from becoming a career.

Answer 5

finally! all of us is commencing their eyes to verify the certainty and the info displayed right here communicate for themselves. After that great answer from gypsy_cat 345, i've got not got plenty to assert different than that human beings like Vanessa ought to look into the bigger image and make her very own checks, fairly than believing in what the media want human beings to believe. additionally, i do no longer think of human beings ought to balme the Islamic faith for the strikes of ignorant so-reported as Muslims who declare they're appearing on its behalf. secondly, i do no longer think of Israel is merely a small us of a that needs to be left on my own. If this grow to be the case it does no longer have waged an entire-blown conflict on lebanon, killing hundreds of human beings as a manner to regain 2 of their infantrymen who have been captured by making use of Hezbollah. shouldn't they think of approximately liberating the hundreds of hundreds of lebanese prisoners at present in Israel! Thirdly, Muslims have not got something against Jews. the venture is with the Zionists and Israelis. BTW, i'm no longer Lebanese. i'm merely asserting what i beleive is the certainty

Answer 6

Good question. You get an atta boy. I used to answer that on faith.

Faith is a rare thing today

Answer 7

You don't preach what you practice at home.That's a part of the liberty.