2007-12-08 17:43:56 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes, it would make it much easier for me to choose--Ron Paul.
2007-12-08 17:52:20 · update #1
Ron Paul.
That's an easy decision for me :)
2007-12-08 17:49:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 8⤋
I would choose Ron Paul
2007-12-11 22:51:05 · answer #2 · answered by Dungeon Master 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul.
2007-12-09 13:58:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul
2007-12-09 04:20:15 · answer #4 · answered by Mr.Robot 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
The short answer is Ron Paul. Not even "His Divine Shadow" can deny the honesty of this good man. But, it seems he would vote against him for some reason other than an honest vote to help our country.
That begs the question: How many other hateful, spiteful voters would be out there if your proposed scenario were to come to pass? I can only assume the person in question thinks he/she is a Christian and that's ok 'cept for one thing that most Christians have overlooked. It seems to me they think they are invading and taking over government when exactly the opposite is true. Think about it, politics invaded the pulpits first. It was not the other way around. Christians did not invade politics, politicians invaded and are using the Christians!
The Ron Paul sheep? How many times have the faithful been described as the "flock"? Come on folks, wake up! Wake up! Pray to whatever diety that supports your moral beliefs but remember, none of those dieties will be on the ticket for president. Your freedom to make those prayers were set up in this country by a bunch of Diests. If you don't know what that word means, please, look it up.
Thomas Jefferson made it very plain in the Treaty of Tripoli that the US government is secular. Regardless of what your current evangelical leader tells you "secular" is not a bad word. Being secular gives everyone the freedom to choose their religion! The Bible instructs Christians to respect all other religions. If we lose our secularism we also lose that freedom! Christians, wake up! Wake up!
2007-12-09 07:21:19 · answer #5 · answered by Dick W 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Ron Paul
2007-12-09 02:40:08 · answer #6 · answered by Wutz it worth 2 ya? 6 · 4⤊ 7⤋
Ron Paul, of course.
2007-12-09 03:18:39 · answer #7 · answered by vox_of_reason2 3 · 4⤊ 6⤋
I've said over and over again, ANYBODY BUT RON PAUL. Coincidently, this is the ONLY reason I'd vote for Clinton. But I'd choke down the bile and do it before giving Ron Paul's sheep the satisfaction.
2007-12-09 02:20:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 7⤋
Dr. Ron Paul.
But it still hurts.
2007-12-09 02:16:24 · answer #9 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 6⤊ 6⤋
Ron Paul. BTW, I would choose him ahead of ALL the candidates.
Ron Paul for president!
2007-12-09 02:21:38 · answer #10 · answered by Ash'ari Maturidi 5 · 6⤊ 8⤋
Who are these that talk about Ron Paul?????
Can anyone compare voting records with Ron? No
Has any other candidate shown any understanding whatsoever economically? No
Congress voted to give themselves raises. Did Ron except his ? NO.
That's why he is Dr. NO
2007-12-09 02:13:24 · answer #11 · answered by Jake & Jamie W 2 · 7⤊ 8⤋