English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Even Senate Majority leader Harry Reid said the war in Iraq "is lost."

2007-12-08 16:09:24 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

31 answers

Treason is the reason!

2007-12-08 16:11:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8 7

The war was "lost" when we pulled out of Afghanistan and had only lost 52 American lives. This is when Bush officially declared the war over. Its not so much that the Liberals "support and encourage" terrorism but do to the profit they make from it, it would seem that way. War is good for a sluggish economy. Its all about putting money in deep pockets, regardless of the price paid...in this case, the price of almost 4000 (if not more ) American Soldiers and countless Iraqi Civilians. People are like sheep...they will follow, if led down the beaten path, blindly stepping off the edge of an abyss. Why? Because its easier to follow the status quo, secure in their comfort zone, than to stand up- for WHAT IS RIGHT AND JUST. Terrorism, and the likes, is all about profit, that and forcing our propaganda and government down the throats of third world countries in the name of humanitairism. Notice that terrorism is spawned on a basis of religion. Who are we, the most secular nation in the world, to step into a third world country, force our secular ways upon them, then stand back in anger and awe when they fight back? Terrorism is WRONG. But what has the most powerful nation world taught them? That it is the only way to get our attention. Liberals count on this...its all about the money darlin'...their bank accounts are getting bigger, our taxes, and the blood of our sons and daughters, husbands and wives making them that way.

2007-12-08 16:34:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

For years the Liberals have inspired immigration into Canada without the right tests and balances. the reason being the the low to mid earnings immigrant kinfolk in lots of cases vote Liberals, and it is how they controlled to stay in capability for see you later. comparable as why the NDP encourages development centred backed housing in cities. this grants them a secure voter base specially constituencies. What i do no longer understand is why Liberals are so spectacular to criminals. they have lower back and lower back voted against stiffer effects for sexual offenders, serial killers. they have refused to improve the age of sexual consent.

2016-10-10 21:30:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

You know, so why are you asking? Because we 1) hate America 2) hate Christmas 3) love Oprah 4) think torture is not only wrong but ineffective 5) can't understand that Iraq arranged 9/11, because the facts say otherwise 6) hate Bush and don't realize that he's the greatest U.S. President since James Buchanan, etc. etc. ad infinitum ad nauseam and you know, before the terrorists, it was the Communists, and we're just not frigging patriotic like you are, even though our sons and daughters get just as dead, maimed and mindless in the wars you morons mismanage, and even though when Communism did fall apart in eastern Europe, the folks who made it happen, like Vaclav Havel in Czechoslovakia and Lech Walesa in Poland, were way more similar to the liberal intellectuals and union organizers you revile than to the pompous windbags like Coulter, O'Reilly, Limbaugh and Kristol who you make your idols.

That's why we liberals support and encourage terrorists, because this kind of insipid, baiting question makes death seem like a mercy.

2007-12-08 16:30:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

When a representative Of CAIR directly contacts Jon Conyers (House Judiciary Chairman) to act as a go-between for them and the DOJ... that reeks of wet canines.

2007-12-08 16:19:01 · answer #5 · answered by Doctor DNC 6 · 2 1

The same as the Conservatives thought , Iraq would be lost , as Cheney said back in 1995

2007-12-08 16:14:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Another dumbass who has not figured it out yet. The "War in Iraq" is technically not a war. The U.S. stormed Iraq, captured Saddam, and are now trying to build a democracy. There is no win/lose situation, since our troops occupy Iraq. Our troops fight Muslim extremists and will continue to do so (they train their kids to be extremist). In a class discussion, we found there are many parallels to the Vietnam War and this one. For one, this is not our war, it is Muslim holy war, and the U.S. stuck its nose in it. Also, the number of deaths. Our troops are giving their lives for their country, and it happens to be one of the greatest military mistakes the U.S. has ever made. To answer, we have already lost, we have lost too many damn lives. And for what? So they can continue to police their country while the Iraqi parliament does nothing. This war was a mistake.

2007-12-08 16:23:58 · answer #7 · answered by ga_tx_1992 4 · 4 4

For the purpose of understanding this phenomenon, It is best to think of liberals as "Mommies", who want to "make nice" and not fight and conservatives as "Daddies" who want kids to stand up for themselves even if a fight ensues.

Liberals therefore are generally inclined to appease and hope that bullies will be mollified and not continue to bully. Conservatives are more cynical about the world and believe that appeasing bullies only encourages them to do more.

The Mommy / Daddy divide also explains the desire of Liberals for a welfare ( read Mommy ) state and conservatives want to rely on individual responsibility rather than taking care of people who might otherwise take care of themselves.

2007-12-08 16:15:49 · answer #8 · answered by LucaPacioli1492 7 · 6 3

The war in Iraq had nothing to do with terrorists, and had nothing to do with Weapons of Mass Destruction. It had something to do with the leftovers from Bush senior. Follow the money ..........

2007-12-08 16:45:11 · answer #9 · answered by Tardisman 2 · 1 4

Liberals live in Denial. they want "diversity". that includes every one. Chriatians, Jews, Athiets, Agnostics, Muslims, Muslim Fundamentalists, Rasical Islamists, Muslim extreamists, the ACLU, Islamic Fundamentalista, Jihadists.....i could keep going.

2007-12-08 16:35:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Don't think anyone will support it.
Just living human kind at loss with our creator's universal gifts of life.
In overcoming the mess out there.
With lost sense of direction and purpose of life.
While trying to solve the mess out there.
When the easy way is out there.
Prefer to do it with " My way"
Luke 9.55-56
What do you think?

2007-12-08 16:17:00 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers