Why won't America provide universal health care for all Americans?

Answer 1

Because the BigPharma and insurance company lobbies won't allow it - it would dramatically impact on their profits.

Answer 2

It's not Constitutional.

It does not work in any country where it exists.

Government's excessive intrusiveness AND the unfair advantages to the handful of insurance companies that dominate the market CAUSE the problems in health care.

LIES were and are told about how doctors are ripping people off and the government. NOT TRUE and NEVER documented once. There are a few crooks in the medical profession, but they are few and far between. Even when they can get in big trouble there are STILL docs who see patients for free, reduced cost, or write off bills. The intrusion of third parties has tried to create an adversarial relationship between doctors and patients.

Smelling blood in the water, predatory lenders are after the most vulnerable:
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/nov2007/db20071120_397008.htm

A good, but so far ignored plan (pols don't get a benefit from it as it makes things fair; lobbyists will hate it as the overinflated salaries for execs will likely disappear), is this:
http://www.booklocker.com/books/3068.html
The plan is in the PDF.

Universal health care is code for RATIONING. Because of the costs of such care being ridiculous (Medicare premium 1998: $43.80; Medicare premium effective 2008: $96.40--more than double with no corresponding increase in benefits), universal health care WOULD fail here as it is in every other country with it. Let's also look at how American Indians get shafted in their special government health care program, the IHS:
info.ihs.gov/Files/FundingDisparity-Jan2007.doc

The facts speak for themselves when someone bothers to dig them up.

Answer 3

Hey what a great idea. I mean it worked so well in england and canada right? oh and that is a seventh of our economy so it wouldn't effect jobs or anything. After all the government does such an awesome job with running things I mean look at social security. That is like almost perfect. But hey lets not stop there. Don't you think food is more important then health care? I think the government should provide food for all americans. GIVE ME A BIG MAC NOW AMERICA. and after all we all need homes so the government should buy everybodys house for them.. yeah oh and issue cars too. yeah that would be sweet! And everybody should have a job too and clothes and computers and not pay fot it. But we would have to be fair so everybody has the same health care and the same car and the same house style and the same food and the same clothes. Yeah that is only fair after all. Then we can all move to russia and live in our beautiful communist utopia. Good idea buddy. I like the way you think.

Answer 4

there is no such element as "unfastened" well being care. it would be paid for by ability of taxes (like numerous government classes), meaning it would be paid for by ability of tax payers. Being a tax, it would be mandatory to pay, whether you're no longer ill. So right here is what happens, I pay $a hundred consistent with month for government run well being care, yet I consume magnificent and exercising, so I under no circumstances use it. So $a hundred of my money is being stolen from me for no reason in any appreciate. i'd desire to apply that money to place nutrition on the table, positioned my young ones by using college, get activity education, or only purchase an XBox. yet because of the fact's a tax, i'm forced to pay for the "unfastened" well being care that I under no circumstances use. In what universe does that sound like a good thought? apart from, if it is run by ability of the government, that's a monopoly. Monopolies are undesirable, constantly have been, constantly would be. at the instant, if I even have Blue go and that they screw me, I even have the liberty to alter to Aetna, United, Humana, and so on. If it is run by ability of a central authority monopoly, then whilst they screw me, what do I do? There are not the different possibilities (aka a monopoly). returned, in what universe is this a good thought? There are not any good arguments in prefer of a central authority run monopoly controlling who gets scientific therapy, and who lives and dies. that's without doubt considered one of the worst strategies in human historic past. ...EDIT. To the fool that suggested well being care is a magnificent: it somewhat is only straight forward DUMB! If there are not any docs, who will fullfil your "magnificent" to healthcare? no longer something may well be a magnificent if it demands yet another guy or woman to pay for it. that's the stupidity that our government run colleges churn out, what style of moron would want those self same human beings working our well being care device? insanity!

Answer 5

Because WE DO NOT WANT IT....We can take care of ourselves. Universal/Socialist Health care is failing everywhere it is tried. The tax burden is outrageous, and the health care is inferior.

Answer 6

Because America is not a singular entity that supplies its citizens with whatever they want, it IS the citizens. Why is it my job as a citizen to supply my own health care, and yours, too?

Answer 7

Because it is unconstitutional.

There is nothing in the constitution giving the federal government the power to take over health care.

Answer 8

Because we don't want it. It will mean a lower standard of care, long waits for service, and the government knowing our business. just to name a few.....

Answer 9

Because the quality of health care would greatly diminish. besides the fact that I don't want my hard earned money paying for insurance for someone to sorry to work....

Answer 10

because Insurance companies and CEOs will stop contributing what we call 'political contributions' in America which is called BRIBERY is most other advanced countries!