How many members of Congress have children in the Washington DC public school system?

Question

If none, why do they oppose offering poor folks the same opportunities their children have via vouchers?

Answer 1

Probably none. Because most if not all politicians have a belief that they and their families are in an elite class, far above the common man. They prance around like royalty, and we the people are stupid enough to allow it!

Answer 2

None, although the private school teachers are paid much less that thpublic school teachers, the private schools actually beat the public schools by an average of 12-17% in test scores*. So go figure. It is interesting that the union dictates so much, but adjusting everything, public teachers average $43,000, with only a 1%$ average raise in the last 8 years*. They can say it is because the kids would be targets, but it has always been that way and i feel it is not setting a ggod example. They need to have a taste of what America is getting and might change. Nah! Take care.

Answer 3

Has it occured to you that nearly every Congressman's family lives in his home district, they obviously would not go to D.C. public schools? And can you really not see the value in supporting the public school system, which is where most children attend whether they have a choice or not? An argument can be made for vouchers, but it's not the one you seem to be making.

Answer 4

Huh? What do vouchers have to do with anything? Most members of congress do not relocate to Washington, they live in their home districts. Also, most members of congress are too old to have school-aged children.

If the public school system is broken, it should be fixed. Driving all the students out isn't going to fix it.

Answer 5

I nevertheless this became a severe question. seems i became incorrect as this sounds like a rant. Or a minimum of a loaded question trolling for particular responses and not any actual choose for debate. yet given which you asked: the regular public of Bush's significant spending happened stunning close to the tip of his presidency. that did no longer bypass away plenty time for any communities to form and reaction. Secondly, the country has been complacent for see you later that it took time for human beings to attain in basic terms how undesirable the spending became getting. upload on the election 3 hundred and sixty 5 days campaigning mess and hype, and there wasn't any room for plenty opposition to form. Then Obama got here in and blew away Bush's spending, inflicting human beings to be bowled over into action. maximum heavily, who the heck cares with regard to the previous. what's significant is what's happening NOW. we gained't bypass right into a friggin time device and bypass returned to alter issues, so we could concentration on the end results of issues happening stunning now. Out of interest, the place are human beings such as you getting this impact that Bush had such solid help? in terms of militia and national protection, definite. yet economically and in terms of government spending, he did no longer relish any great help even between Republicans (actually electorate.. no longer congressmen).

Answer 6

Maybe 3. They take every opportunity to keep poor people uneducated and poor. Why share the wealth when it can be captured by a small percentage of society and used to keep the masses down? Just don't abort them.

Answer 7

Not sure about kids in D.C. public schools but , my friend since childhood is a congressman from Colorado and his kids are in public schools in Colorado. We grew up on neighboring farms. No other people within 4 miles except for his family and our family.

Answer 8

Do you mean legitimate children or illegitimate

Answer 9

zero