http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AgKjhcNjdWDJLdfcXcGB59vY7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20071208170823AAJH4EG
i couldn't believe the answers i got.
"last 100 years . . . temp. increase of 1 degree" whether it sounds so or not, this is incredibly significant. if it was so insignificant, the ice wouldn't be melting, the ph level of the oceans wouldn't be down .5, and a record high number of specie extinctions would not be occuring.
"can't predict the weather two weeks from now" on a microscopice scale, no. we can't get the temp right within .1 degrees, but we get the general temp? yes. this has nothing to do with the global warming argument anyway.
brianthepig's answer was my favorite. he says mars is heating, therefore the sun is to blame. solar levels are on the DECLINE.not only that, but half the planets in the solar system are cooling.all this proves is that we do not have the same atmosphere as mars, and that all planets' environmental conditions aren't not controlled by one factor
2007-12-08
12:49:02
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
“arrogance to presume to understand nature better than nature herself” until mother nature herself learns to speak English fluently, I’m afraid we’re going to depend on our own methods. I’m not even sure if that post warrants this much of a response.
“Well why dont you show us the flawed data that global warming is entirely based on? Why dont you tell us why a British court found the data to be seriously flawed and biased? . . .” the data isn’t flawed. Here’s one piece though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Climate_Change_Attribution.png please disprove it
2007-12-08
12:49:16 ·
update #1
As for your comment about the british courts: the british courts declared that certain statements in gore’s movie were either inaccurate or not proven. they also said that major premise still stood, and that AGW was a virtual fact. As far as losing grant money: skeptics get paid MORE than advocates. Oil companies fund them. As far as the NAS, I’ve never heard of this study. Please show it to me and I’ll message you privately.
To the guy who mentioned global cooling: that was a minority of scientists. So few there wasn’t even a single commission on the subject. In that case, as in mnay other, the minority was wrong. Right now, the minority is suggesting AGW isn’t real.
2007-12-08
12:49:31 ·
update #2
slacker: and any degree of warming / cooling is perfectly ok? no!
2007-12-08
12:54:14 ·
update #3
same answer to jade.
a thirty straight year temperature increase is, by no measure, normal. and to the third poster: no, we aren't sitting pretty. temp levels mimick co2 levels. co2 levels are at an all time high.
2007-12-08
12:58:00 ·
update #4
ice age = gradual temp decrease over hundreds and thousands of years. what we're going through now is a dramatic increase in temp
2007-12-08
12:59:01 ·
update #5