http://mediamatters.org/items/200406220008
2007-12-08 12:37:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So it's your contention that the 9/11 commision was wrong?
2007-12-08 13:31:14 · update #1
global warming has about 100 times the evidence supporting it compared to the "Osama offer to Clinton" and the "WMD went to Syria" theories..
isn't if funny when they say they are the "party of logic and facts".... yet believe some very shaky facts when it agrees with them, but knock studies that have been done many times over?
2007-12-08 12:43:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
If you are depending on media matters - a pro clinton organization that has issues with the truth . there is no hope. It is not a news organization.
It is not a lie that Sudan offered Usama to clinton.
2007-12-08 21:23:14 · answer #2 · answered by Laura G 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The only lie to be found in your question is in your source material. Media Matters has been wrong before and will be again. Clinton did in fact turn down bin Laden, not once, but twice.
When will liberals stop lying and then accusing Republicans of lying simply because they are trying to correct the liberal falsehoods?
2007-12-08 20:50:15 · answer #3 · answered by Grayrider 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"And we'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him. At the time, 1996, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America. So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have. But they thought it was a hot potato and they didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan." Quoting President Clinton in the mediamatters link listed above,
How could he "not bring him (Bin Laden) here because we had no basis to hold him" if he didn't have access to him? If they didn't offer Bin Laden to President Clinton, he couldn't have brought him here anyway, so why give a reason for not bringing him here?
2007-12-08 20:54:09 · answer #4 · answered by madd texan 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. They have been very successful in their propaganda campaigns. Research has shown that the more a lie is repeated the more people will believe it. Newt taught the Repubs well with his lies. Rove perfected it. And Cheney wrote the book. Bush? He is just the puppet.
2007-12-08 20:43:52 · answer #5 · answered by joker_32605 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's not a lie it's a fact. Try reading a book called 9/11 by Noam Chomsky.
2007-12-08 20:45:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Look, Bill Clinton is a lying, skirt chasing hypocrite of the first order.
Shouldn't we just be happy he is not President anymore? He seems never to go away, like a disease that keeps returning.
2007-12-08 20:44:00 · answer #7 · answered by mysterian 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'm really trying to believe Republican lies But I lack the faith
2007-12-08 20:45:25 · answer #8 · answered by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
your question has no answer as there is no lie. even clinton admitted it on cnn genius...
WHEN WILL THE PELOSI LIBERAL SPIN END???
2007-12-08 20:52:55 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
mediamatters works for the clinton machine.You have been coned!!!!!!!!
2007-12-08 20:46:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋