Should the U.S cut all FED FUNDING to cities who do not enforce federal laws like Immigration?

Question

Also to publically funded schools and colleges who insist on not teaching education but instead teaching political views and social diversity and punishing the students who want to learn real education. our public school system is unrepairably broken and pumping money into it make it worst.

federal funding is money that the federal gov alots or matches to the staes. fed taxes comes from you and I not the state , the state collect its own taxes. don't read much huh?

maybe you ment revenue

Answer 1

That "federal funding" is money from the STATES. The feds have no legal right to refuse to return a portion to the very people who paid it. Isn't that the whole point of federal taxes?

Answer 2

The federal government are the ones that are responsible to enforce the immigration laws. They, being slaves to their corporate money masters, do not enforce them. The state governments who see the harm being done to the population of their state are taking matters into their own hands. The federal government is declaring their actions illegal, while at the same time, side stepping the problem to satisfy the corporate world. the answer does not lie in withholding funds of any kind. Eliminate the cause. Remove the incumbents in congress. Replace the entire body & start over. If those elected do not do the peoples business, vote them out! We sunk to this level of production in government by the majority of people not bothering to vote. Only special interest vote, only the special interest are served by the government.

Answer 3

Yes - start with San Francisco. San Francisco can compensate by pulling the funds for (police and other support) the Folsom Street Fair next year. No big loss.

Answer 4

Yep.