I also noted that Gerry is to be made "Scott of the Year",,,Hmm scott free maybe,,
2007-12-08 11:07:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
17⤊
4⤋
Hi Adam .This is just the next chapter in this ridiculous saga that these two neglectors have cooked up to keep the abduction theory alive and kicking.They have continually given everyone the run around from day one but fortunately the PJ seem to have their card marked.We now read that the rogatory letters from the PJ will be held up in endless Red Tape and that the re interviews probably won't happen until after Christmas.Let's hope that when they do the PJ nail this pair and their buddies once and for all and that little girl can rest in peace.
2007-12-08 20:35:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by little weed 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
when a bird see's a cat near her nest of young ones, she draws the cat away by making a load of noise and pretending to be injured.
People do the same when they've done wrong and want to draw attention away from themselves. I don't know if the Mc's have done wrong beside neglect, but, I believe the police can carry on doing their police work without suggestions from the Mc's........
I'm sure the Mc's think they know it all, but somewhere there is a very smart detective who knows his job well.
We must be patient.
2007-12-09 00:35:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Curious39 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes this couple neglected their child leading to her disappearance, for which they are now being heavily critisized by a good percentage of the population, but you don't seem to want the search for their daughter to continue. Why would you object to them looking for more evidence that may help find her?
You need to make up your mind what your real intentions are by this endless debating. Do you want what is best for Madeleine McCann, or do you just want to be 'right' all the time?
2007-12-08 22:21:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by lilmissdisorganised 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
They have been wasting police time since May. Every time they have to be questioned or are seem to look more guilty, then they come up with something to take the heat off them.
justice will be done for Maddy....God rest her soul
2007-12-08 12:15:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by elsie1912 4
·
7⤊
3⤋
You're right... Funny how they are not prepared to face the investigation and refuse to answer the 40 then 100 questions posed by the PJ-GNR... they offered to then changed their minds about submiting to lie detector tests.... would NEVER allow the Portuguese Police to "...bully them out of Portugal" and then fleed the jurisdiction THE DAY AFTER they were made official suspects... and yet they DEMAND that the Portuguese Police to do this and that !! That is comical and does not look really very pretty to the rest of the world.
GOOD ANSWER "MORK" !!
2007-12-08 11:17:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by RED-CHROME 6
·
11⤊
4⤋
Why do you waste your time repeating the same old crap? I bet you still wear a Leisure suit, don't you?
2007-12-09 16:35:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by HarleyRider 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
These two are incredible! It's all me me me.. I think the Police should tell them to get stuffed and if they want their help then for them to help them and answer the questions they have refused!
They don't want the truth, they just want to waste every-ones time and keep the devil of truth away from their door, they are utterly sickening..
Scot of the year! for what? acting ability? conman? liar?, oh I know it must be for having the most arrogant and angry face of the year, which the public would love to punch..
2007-12-08 11:28:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
12⤊
3⤋
James Dean - he has listed his sources, are you seriously saying that the McConns would sue someone on YA quoting a newspaper and not sue the newspaper itself ?... they would be laughed out of court you stupid moron, go get a life yourself - idiot
There seems to be a string of idiots answering McCann questions... well insulting the questioner, what morons, do these people wait up all night to abuse certain people - what a bunch of sad losers
2007-12-08 11:17:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
11⤊
4⤋
Firstly Adam you are reacting to an article in a newspaper that is notorious for getting it 'wrong'. Secondly I think the police should have interviewed everyone that was there, at the time of the childs disappearance, if they didn't that is an error on their part. Thirdly you are calling two people you don't know cretins, how do you support this view? I agree the children should not have been left on their own, but they aren't the first parents to do it, nor will they be the last. They may be suspects, but that's also not the first time it has happened and nor will it be the last. My husband was imprisoned for a crime he didn't commit, even though the police and Judge told me he was innocent. He spent two months in a foreign prison, two months more in the country on remand, and technically he is still on remand even though he was allowed to come home. The police know the names of the guilty parties, but because they can't find them, they need 'guilty' people, and their records to show they are doing something to resolve the crime. My husband was one of six people detained, they have all been released but all suffered the same punishment - are they cretins? Or am I a cretin because I'm married to him?
You need to be more open minded, have more tolerance and understanding and don't believe everything you read in the newspapers, especially the one you are quoting from, who wouldn't publish my husband's story because ' it wasn't interesting enough' in other words there wasn't enough muck they could fling.
2007-12-08 11:26:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by translatorinspain 4
·
4⤊
11⤋
Robert Murat is the MAIN suspect and it won't be long before his swinging pals are brought into question.
2007-12-08 12:37:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by Zed 6
·
1⤊
4⤋