(and yes, I know Romney is not "technically" a preacher - but if it walks like a duck...)
2007-12-08 09:45:31 · 11 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Quack, quack The answer is no. But it is a moot point because the majority of Americans do not want religion to be the guiding force of our government. We have lost enough civil rights under Bush and Cheney, we don't need to lose anymore.
2007-12-08 09:54:44 · answer #1 · answered by lcmcpa 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
this is only extra political calculation. Hillary has a staffer launch to Novak a message that they've crap on Obama yet do no longer desire to tell all people what it relatively is. day after right this moment they deny it, and then make an apology for it. Too previous due! injury achieved (which became the plan all alongside). Huckabee is making an attempt to do the same undertaking. deliver out little jabs, and is making an attempt to deliver the message that "actual" Christians could in no way vote for a Mormon. Then can make an apology and desire to cut back the aftermath of this type of fact. Why could all people vote for this type of guy as Huckabee? because of the fact they're fundamentalist nuts thats why (all and sundry else would be balloting for yet another). i would be balloting for Romney.
2016-12-10 16:50:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a democrat, but I believe Romney has more of a clue than Huckabee. Huckabee has been a horrible governor of Arkansas! He has been investigated 6 times for taking money from the Arkansas government to pay for personal things and was convicted twice and he released a convicted rapist from jail early who went on to rape and murder at least 2 more women in Missouri. Huckabee is clueless and whoever votes for him would also have to be clueless. It does not even matter that he a preacher or not, he obviously does not practice what he preaches.
2007-12-08 10:01:08 · answer #3 · answered by Jen 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not that I agree with Huckabee, but he was Governor of Arkansas just like Bill Clinton was, and he was voted in twice. Personally, I don't think any of the candidates on either side are worth the time of day.
2007-12-08 10:00:44 · answer #4 · answered by outsider_27 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You know, Tennessee used to have a law against clergymen running for office. I think that's a very good idea.
Huckabee is too ignorant to be the president. Romney is too immoral.
2007-12-08 09:55:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
In the over 200 year history of our country...not a single president has ever been elected that ran a country prior to his election.
2007-12-08 09:50:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Romney has illegals working for him, then blames someone else for his lawbreaking. That makes Romney the perfect Republican to run the country, don't take responsibility for anything.
2007-12-08 09:51:12 · answer #7 · answered by Stewie Griffin 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
may do a great job. cant be any worse than the other jack-offs that have been running the country. besides they are not running around thumping the bible in their campains
2007-12-08 09:52:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
At 85% Christian population they are probably closer to what the people want than an atheist would be.
2007-12-08 09:55:12 · answer #9 · answered by Locutus1of1 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes, whether or not you like them or not, they both have the background, much mthan ANY of the Democratic front runners.
2007-12-08 09:51:42 · answer #10 · answered by Dr. West 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋