First, I hope your English teacher did not give you that. 'Sargent' is not a word in English. There is a word 'sergeant', meaning a noncommissioned officer.
Assuming that is the only error, you can make a grammatically correct sentence with punctuation:
The man (the soldier) the sergeant hit (shot) ran.
Trouble is, it makes just as good a sentence as:
The man the soldier (the sergeant) hit (shot) ran.
Adding parentheticals to expain/elaborate on/further define words used is an acceptable method, but this one seems to have been contrived as an example, not as a real-world sentence.
2007-12-08 09:15:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by dollhaus 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The sentence is missing the linkages "that" or "whom" and that's why it's confusing. But here's what it means:
The sargent hit the soldier. The soldier shot the man. The man ran.
2007-12-08 20:03:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by BlackSea 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm confused by the two verbs in succession. Maybe using parentheses to make one of the characters an appositive would help, something like: The man the soldier (the sergeant) hit ran. Here a soldier (who's a sergeant) hits a man who then runs away. Or: The man the soldier--the sergeant--shot, ran. That's the best I can do, but I'm betting I'm not on target. Are you sure the teacher had both "shot" and "hit" in the sentence?
2007-12-08 17:03:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by geoe41 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The man the soldier, who was a Sargent, hit with his shot ran away.
2007-12-08 16:54:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dale P 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The sergeant ran the soldier the hit man shot.
Since the sergeant is in charge of the soldier(s) under him/her, then he is said to run them. This is the only way I can think of that this would make sense sans any added words or punctuation marks. Also, doing it this way makes "hit" a noun by placing it with "man", thus having the man be a hit man (a person who gets paid to kill people).
2007-12-08 16:56:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The man, the soldier the sergeant hit - shot - ran?
meaning did the man, who was actually a soldier who was hit (shot) by the sergeant,run?
2007-12-08 18:10:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by biff.1145 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
the man hit the soldier the shot sargent ran?
2007-12-08 16:41:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by luckyduck 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
You have to break it down from the inside out.
The sargent hit a soldier, who shot a man, who ran.
2007-12-08 16:53:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋