English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The reason why Bush is keeping our soldiers in Iraq is to stop the insurgency from making Iraq into another safe haven for terrorists. He's said that that is the reason, many times. If we left Iraq tommorow without stopping the insurgency, the terrorists would use Iraq as a hideout to launch a second terrorist attack on America. If that happened, we would need to put the troops in Iraq back into Iraq. Why should we leave Iraq then?

2007-12-08 08:14:06 · 9 answers · asked by bionicleis2cool117 1 in News & Events Current Events

9 answers

I tend to think that there were no terrorists in Iraq before the invasion

2007-12-08 08:19:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 2

People have grown tired of hearing about the war... after the emotions of 9/11 have faded, now all people want is to bring home loved ones before more loose their lives, however if the troops are pulled out of Iraq before the job there is done, someone, if not us...will have to go back and do this again! God Bless our Troops!

The current terrorist plot is already happening here, since Americas are loosing their jobs because labor's cheaper somewhere else in the world and the Bush administration supports this position! The workers here affected by layoffs often have to accept work for much less salary, so our tax base is also shrinking... Combined with the cost of natural disasters, decaying infrastructure (roads, bridges, railways) increasing fuel and medical costs and inflation will help to bankrupt our country until our economy collapses in to a depression, which will in turn limit military spending, end the wars abroad, bring our troops home to chaos and civil disobedience, affecting Americas ability to defend herself. The End...

Ten years ago, this would have sounded like a book or movie plot; today it’s becoming a reality…Wake up America!

2007-12-08 09:10:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Amadinajad has suggested as plenty. He has advised the international that united statesa. is loosing its will to combat and could pull out quickly and Iran would be their to fill the void. We additionally understand what's going to take place to those that are deemed to have been sympathetic to the individuals, they are going to be dragged out into the streets and killed, in basic terms like after the 1st gulf conflict as quickly as we left after encouraging them to upward push up and combat Saddam. The conflict has been a gigantic cock up, yet each little bit of information we are receiving from the two facets of the political spectrum is asserting that we are finally on the upswing, to bypass away now would reason irreparable injury. and people who say that they are worse off then previously we cam have for sure no longer observed the documents showing that extra properties have electrical energy and working water then while Saddam became in potential. human beings nonetheless stay in worry, even nevertheless it fairly is getting extra effective, and that they do no longer look to agonize that with the aid of fact they misplaced a soccer tournament that they are going to be crippled. Or that in the event that they do no longer gain a objective set for them at artwork that they are going to lose their life. every physique is of a similar opinion that we are responsible for the situations in Iraq stunning now. So we've a duty to restoration it. And if we don't in basic terms abandon them we in basic terms could.

2016-11-14 22:17:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Terrorists are going to exist somewhere. There isn't any way to completely wipe them off the face of this Earth. As long as there are religious fanatics, they'll be quarreling about something. Better them be over there than here.

2007-12-08 08:58:11 · answer #4 · answered by iamamuhfjer 2 · 3 1

As James said.Bush opened the doors to the terrorists in Iraq.America broke it,they bought it.Problem is it'll never be fixed.It would be ludicrous to leave the innocent Iraqi people to pay the price for such an ill-conceived invasion.

2007-12-08 08:30:19 · answer #5 · answered by Misty Blue 7 · 1 3

You're preaching to the choir here. The problem is so many people no longer believe there were no WMD in Iraq and no matter what Bush says, they're not going to listen. That, I believe is the crux of the situation.

2007-12-08 08:23:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

it will be good to get out

but when the government is able to guarantee the safety of it's own people

if the government is strong the terrorists will just have to go where they are welcome - next door in Iran, where most reportedly come from anyway

2007-12-08 08:23:40 · answer #7 · answered by Tequila.... 7 · 0 3

I agree. And beyond that, it would be uconscionably irresponsible to take out Saddam's government without staying around to help stabilize the new one. "You broke it, you bought it." That's the Pottery Barn doctrine of foreign policy, an just as fair in foreign policy as it is in retail.

2007-12-08 08:48:18 · answer #8 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 2 6

Keep them all in one place and you know where to look for them

2007-12-08 08:24:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 9

fedest.com, questions and answers